Oncofusion

start / graph / gene-rnf40

Proteinstrong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.Q-histone-marks

RNF40 (BRE1B) — the obligate partner of RNF20, and the one of the pair with a documented link to differentiation and bivalency resolution

also called RNF40 · BRE1B · STARING · E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1B · RING finger protein 40

RNF40 is the second half of the two-protein enzyme that tags histone H2B with ubiquitin; neither half works alone. Its distinctive contribution is that cells need it to switch genes from a poised, undecided state to an active one during differentiation — which is the exact step KMT2A-fusion leukaemia cells fail to take.

The same thing, for a scientist

RNF40 (O75150, 1001 aa, BRE1B) is the obligate heterodimer partner of RNF20 in the human H2BK120 ubiquitin ligase [E1]. Functionally it is not interchangeable in the literature: the cleanest published RNF40-specific result is that RNF40 is required for the induction of differentiation markers and transcriptional reprogramming of human mesenchymal stem cells, dependent on CDK9 and the WAC adaptor, and specifically required for **resolution of the H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalent poised state** on lineage-specific genes during the transition to active chromatin [E2]. That connects the H2Bub layer directly to two existing entries in this graph, `cell-state-primed-bivalent-chromatin` and `mechanism-bivalent-primed-chromatin-fusion-targets`, and to the differentiation block that defines this disease. RNF40 also appears in the infant-ALL panobinostat work as part of the RNF20/RNF40/WAC axis whose suppression depletes H2Bub [E3]. Like RNF20, it shows **no KMT2A selectivity** in DepMap: difference +0.006, rank 9,953 of 17,728 — dead centre of the genome — on a pan-essentiality of -0.490 [E4].

What it looks like
loading AF-O75150-F1…
AlphaFold AF-O75150-F1 ↗
colourshape

This is a prediction, not a measurement. No one has seen this protein in this shape. The colours say how much the software trusts itself, and that is worth reading before anything else — the orange stretches are places the model is effectively saying this part has no fixed shape.

very high (90+)confident (70–90)low (50–70)very low (<50)
I have never read one of these pictures before

A protein is one long chain of amino acids that folds up. The ribbon traces that chain from one end to the other; it is not a wire, it is a simplification of where the backbone runs. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Domains are the stretches of chain that do a particular job, and they are what the coloured blocks above the picture mark out. Click one and the view flies to it. In this project the important question about any domain is usually whether the fusion still has it — the labels say lost where it does not.

Anything in yellow sticks is a bound small molecule, which is usually the drug.

Go deeper
Why RNF40 gets its own entry rather than being folded into RNF20

The granularity rule in this project says one entry per thing, and RNF20 and RNF40 are two things despite acting as one enzyme. Three concrete differences justify the split:

  1. Different published phenotypes. The MLL-leukaemia necessity result is on Rnf20 [gene-rnf20 E1]. The differentiation and bivalency-resolution result is on RNF40 2. Neither paper shows the other subunit does the same thing.
  2. Different DepMap profiles. RNF20 pan-essentiality -0.734 with broad depletion; RNF40 -0.490. A two-protein obligate heterodimer whose subunits have measurably different knockout severities is telling you that one of them has partner-independent functions, or that the knockouts are not equivalent.
  3. Different position in the structure. RNF20 carries the catalytic RING; the heterodimer's activity and its WAC contact are distributed across both, and the 2026 interface work models WAC contacting the RNF20/RNF40 pair rather than either alone [gene-rnf20 E5].
The bivalency result, and why this beat thinks it is the most interesting thing about RNF40

Karpiuk et al. found that H2Bub1 rises during differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and of lineage-committed precursors across several organisms, that RNF40 is required for the induction of differentiation markers and for transcriptional reprogramming, that this requires CDK9 and WAC, and that RNF40 is required to resolve the H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalent state on lineage-specific genes as they move from inactive to active chromatin 2.

The graph already argues that KMT2A-fusion target genes sit in a primed bivalent state (mechanism-bivalent-primed-chromatin-fusion-targets) and that the disease's defining cellular phenotype is a differentiation block (cell-state-differentiation-block). If bivalency resolution is H2Bub-dependent, then the ubiquitin layer is not only upstream of the oncogenic H3K79me2 programme — it is also part of the normal machinery for leaving the poised state.

That sets up a genuinely non-obvious possibility, recorded as an open question rather than a claim: more H2Bub, not less, might push a blocked cell forward. Every intervention this beat considered runs the other way, and nothing in the literature tests the forward direction in KMT2A-rearranged cells.

The caveat is heavy: 2 is mesenchymal stem cells, not haematopoietic cells, and not leukaemia.

The opposition this entry previously left out. Two results cut against the whole framing. First, Shema et al. reduced RNF20 in human cells and found it SUPPRESSES several proto-oncogenes; depletion augmented EGF-driven transcription, increased migration, and elicited transformation and tumorigenesis, with frequent RNF20 promoter hypermethylation in tumours - the ligase behaves as a putative tumour suppressor (PMID 18832071, counter-evidence on 1). Second, Wang et al. found that a strong global H2Bub increase in Atxn7l3-null mouse cells changed Pol II occupancy only modestly and Pol II elongation not at all (PMID 33731875, counter-evidence on 2). Together they say that moving this mark may do little transcriptionally, and that moving it downwards may be worse than doing nothing.

Facts and figures
uniprotO75150
gene symbolRNF40
length AA1001
protein nameE3 ubiquitin-protein ligase BRE1B
alphafold IDAF-O75150-F1
accession resolutionUniProt query gene_exact:RNF40 AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true; primary gene name read back as RNF40 and length 1001 confirmed
complexRNF20/RNF40 heterodimeric E3 ligase (human BRE1), with the WAC adaptor
substratehistone H2B lysine 120
mark writtenmark-h2bk120ub
distinctive functionrequired for resolution of H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalency during differentiation (shown in hMSCs, not in haematopoietic cells)
druggabilityNone known to this beat.
tumour suppressor counterRNF20 depletion elicited transformation and tumorigenesis in human cells; frequent RNF20 promoter hypermethylation in tumours (PMID 18832071)
subnuclear localizationUNPUBLISHED. No imaged subnuclear compartment for RNF40 in any cell type. Chromatin association is inferred from H2Bub120 deposition across transcribed gene bodies, which is a substrate argument and not a localisation measurement; this entry deliberately does not upgrade it.
shown for fusionNO - nobody has looked in any fusion, in any lineage. The bounded localisation query returned 0 against a gene clause of only 119 records, so the RNF40 literature is small enough that this absence is about the field, not about the query.
essentiality
{
  "depmap_common_essential": true,
  "chronos_mean": -0.4902,
  "n_lines": 1208,
  "chronos_mean_kmt2a_rearranged": -0.5204,
  "chronos_mean_other_leukemia": -0.5267,
  "kmt2a_selectivity_difference": 0.0063,
  "genome_wide_rank": "9953/17728",
  "interpretation": "No selectivity. Broadly required, equally in both groups."
}
localization
{
  "subcellular": "Nucleus. UniProt O75150 carries ONE location line, Nucleus, on ONE coded citation (ECO:0000269 PubMed:10944455). HPA immunofluorescence gives a single main location, Nucleoplasm, reliability Supported. Both agree and neither is deep.",
  "subnuclear": "UNPUBLISHED as an imaged compartment. No nucleolar, speckle, PML-body, lamina or nuclear-body observation of RNF40 exists; the bounded subnuclear query returned 1 record and it is about RNF20 and inflammation. What IS known is FUNCTIONAL rather than morphological: RNF20/RNF40 monoubiquitinates H2B on Lys120 across transcribed gene bodies, so the protein is chromatin-associated by assay (ChIP and mark distribution) while never having been given a subnuclear address by microscopy. Recording 'chromatin-bound' here would be an inference from the substrate, not an observation, and this entry declines to make it.",
  "how_shown": "the single UniProt citation plus HPA antibody immunofluorescence; no dedicated RNF40 imaging study",
  "rule_91_note": "PMID 10944455 is titled 'RBP95, a novel leucine zipper protein, binds to the retinoblastoma protein' - a retinoblastoma-interaction paper from 2000 in which RNF40 appears under the name RBP95. Whatever localisation data it contains is incidental to its subject. This is the ordinary rule-91 case: the ECO:0000269 code means a curator saw an experiment, not that this is the founding or the best localisation study. For RNF40 there does not appear to be a better one.",
  "tissue_of_evidence": "non-haematopoietic throughout",
  "node": "localization-chromatin-bound-versus-soluble-fraction-kmt2a"
}
cell type
{
  "haematopoietic_answer": "B CELLS. RNF20 and RNF40 are required in mouse B cells for double-strand-break repair by homologous recombination and for class switch recombination, with DSBs driving a global increase in H2Bub but not in H3K4me3 or H3K79me2 (PMID 30692271). That last detail matters here: the mark this project cares most about, H3K79me2, did NOT move.",
  "why_this_matters_here": "This is the index lineage, and it is the only dedicated haematopoietic RNF40 experiment a bounded search reaches - the gene-clause-plus-haematopoiesis query returned just 2 records.",
  "expression_atlas": "HPA Blood Atlas: low immune cell specificity, Detected in ALL immune cell types; RNA tissue specificity low, with UniProt noting higher levels in testis, heart and pancreas.",
  "context": "mouse B cells (brief rule 73)"
}
cell state
{
  "state": "DNA-DAMAGE / class-switching B cell. The requirement documented in haematopoiesis is for DSB repair and CSR, i.e. a damage-and-recombination state, not a steady-state lineage requirement (PMID 30692271).",
  "bounded": "No RNF40 cell-state result in any leukaemia or in any KMT2A-fusion system."
}
localization bounded absence
{
  "date": "2026-09-21",
  "tool": "NCBI E-utilities esearch, db=pubmed",
  "shape": "gene clause AND localisation clause AND KMT2A/MLL-fusion clause, one [tiab] tag per term (brief rule 94), every cytogenetic term quoted (brief rule 95)",
  "querytranslation_fusion_clause": "\"KMT2A\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"MLL\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"MLL1\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"MLL-AF4\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"MLL-AF9\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"MLL-ENL\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"KMT2A-rearranged\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"MLL-rearranged\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"t 4 11\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"t 9 11\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"MLL fusion\"[Title/Abstract]",
  "count": 0,
  "controls": {
    "fusion_clause_alone": 8743,
    "gene_clause_alone": 119
  },
  "reading": "Counted in TITLES AND ABSTRACTS only; supporting figures were not searched (brief rule 80)."
}
How this could bite us back
  • If the H2Bub layer is what lets a poised gene become active, suppressing it could **deepen** the differentiation block rather than relieve it - the opposite of the intended effect of any writer-directed agent in this disease.
  • RNF40 is broadly required across cancer lines with no KMT2A selectivity, so the toxicity argument that applies to RNF20 applies here too.
  • Panobinostat, the one clinically available agent shown to hit this axis, is a pan-HDAC inhibitor whose paediatric toxicity profile is driven by effects that have nothing to do with H2Bub.
  • The H2B ligase pair is a putative tumour suppressor in the literature that characterised it (PMID 18832071), so an agent that suppresses this axis carries a transformation risk that no leukaemia paper in this beat has excluded.
Still open
  1. Would raising H2Bub1 - rather than lowering it - relieve the differentiation block in KMT2A-rearranged cells? [E2] shows the mark rises during differentiation and that RNF40 is needed to resolve bivalency; every intervention this beat considered goes the other way, and the forward direction is untested in leukaemia.
  2. Is RNF40's bivalency-resolution function preserved in haematopoietic progenitors? The whole inference in this entry rests on an hMSC result.
  3. Why do RNF20 and RNF40 have different DepMap severities (-0.734 vs -0.490) if they are an obligate heterodimer? A partner-independent RNF20 function, or unequal guide efficiency, are the two obvious explanations and they are distinguishable.
  4. RNF40 deposits H2Bub120 across transcribed gene bodies and has never been imaged at subnuclear resolution in any cell. Does it concentrate anywhere - transcription factories, speckle margins - in a KMT2A-rearranged blast, where the fusion's own output is elongation-coupled? This is a genuinely unasked question on a protein whose whole literature is 119 abstracts.
Every source behind this entry (7)
  1. E1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper

    RNF20 and RNF40, both homologues of yeast Bre1, form the 600 kDa complex that is the E3 ligase for human H2B-Lys120 monoubiquitination; the complex is recruited to transcriptionally active genes and RNAi against it reduces H2Bub1 and downstream H3K4 and H3K79 methylation.

    Monoubiquitination of human histone H2B: the factors involved and their roles in HOX gene regulation. · Zhu B, Zheng Y, Pham AD, Mandal SS, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D · Mol Cell 2005
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract read in full; full text not read. RNAi against 'the RNF20/40 complex' does not separate the two subunits.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • Depleting this ligase is reported to be transforming, not therapeutic. Shema et al. reduced RNF20, the major H2B-specific E3, in human cells: only a subset of genes responded, RNF20 SUPPRESSES several proto-oncogenes, and its depletion augmented EGF-driven transcription, increased cell migration and elicited transformation and tumorigenesis, with frequent RNF20 promoter hypermethylation observed in tumours. The pair this entry describes is therefore a putative tumour suppressor in the literature that characterised it, which is direct opposition to treating either subunit as a target. Not leukaemia and not KMT2A-rearranged, and RNF20 rather than RNF40 - but the two are an obligate heterodimer and this entry's own E1 is the paper that established that. Shema E et al. 2008
  2. E2strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    Histone H2B monoubiquitination increases significantly during differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and various lineage-committed precursor cells across diverse organisms; the H2B ubiquitin ligase RNF40 is required for induction of differentiation markers and transcriptional reprogramming of hMSCs; this function depends on CDK9 and the WAC adaptor protein; and RNF40 is required for resolution of the H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalent poised state on lineage-specific genes during the transition from inactive to active chromatin.

    The histone H2B monoubiquitination regulatory pathway is required for differentiation of multipotent stem cells. · Karpiuk O, Najafova Z, Kramer F, Hennion M, Galonska C, Konig A, Snaidero N, Vogel T, Shchebet A, Begus-Nahrmann Y, Kassem M, Simons M, Shcherbata H, Beissbarth T, Johnsen SA · Mol Cell 2012
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract read in full; full text not read. Human mesenchymal stem cells and assorted precursors - **not haematopoietic, not leukaemic, and not KMT2A-rearranged**. The transfer of a bivalency-resolution requirement from hMSC differentiation to the KMT2A-fusion differentiation block is this project's inference and is explicitly flagged as untested. One author surname is rendered without its diacritic here.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The transcriptional consequence of moving H2Bub may be much smaller than a reprogramming model needs. Wang et al. found that the strong global H2Bub increase in Atxn7l3-null mouse ES cells and MEFs produced no more than modest changes in Pol II occupancy and NO change in Pol II elongation, and concluded that H2Bub deubiquitylation does not directly regulate global Pol II transcription. A differentiation-reprogramming role for the mark has to survive that null. The authors themselves note the activity regulates only a subset of genes, so this opposes a global model rather than a locus-level one. Wang F et al. 2021
  3. E3strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    Panobinostat's anti-leukaemic activity in MLL-rearranged ALL involves depletion of H2B ubiquitination via suppression of the RNF20/RNF40/WAC E3 ligase complex, and knockdown of WAC phenocopies loss of H2B ubiquitination with concomitant cell death.

    The HDAC inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) exerts in vivo anti-leukaemic activity against MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and involves the RNF20/RNF40/WAC-H2B ubiquitination axis. · Garrido Castro P, van Roon EHJ, Pinhancos SS, Trentin L, Schneider P, Kerstjens M, Te Kronnie G, Heidenreich O, Pieters R, Stam RW · Leukemia 2018
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract read in full; full text not read. Panobinostat is a pan-HDAC inhibitor with multiple epigenetic effects, so the RNF40 arm is one contributor of unquantified weight.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The selectivity this entry's clinical citation implies is absent when a comparator group is run. In this project's genome-wide DepMap scan RNF40's KMT2A-selectivity difference is +0.006, rank 9,953 of 17,728 - dead centre of the genome - on a pan-essentiality of -0.490; its partner RNF20 is +0.076 at rank 16,229 on -0.734, i.e. marginally LESS required in KMT2A-rearranged lines while being broadly essential. Panobinostat depleting H2Bub in MLL-rearranged ALL is a necessity result in one arm; it is not evidence that the axis is selectively required in this disease. Eleven KMT2A-rearranged lines, AML-weighted, none infant-derived, against a positive literature that is infant B-ALL. Broad Institute DepMap; Cellosaurus; Open Targets Platform; scan run by this project et al. 2026
  4. E4strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.dataset

    In the genome-wide DepMap KMT2A-selectivity scan of 17,728 genes, RNF40 has a KMT2A-rearranged mean gene effect of -0.520 against -0.527 in other leukaemia lines, a difference of +0.006 and a rank of 9,953 of 17,728, on a pan-essentiality of -0.490 across 1,208 lines - no selectivity in either direction.

    DepMap CRISPR (Chronos) genome-wide KMT2A-selectivity scan of 17,728 protein-coding genes, 11 Cellosaurus-annotated KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia lines vs 43 other leukaemia lines · Broad Institute DepMap; Cellosaurus; Open Targets Platform; analysis run by this project (analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full) · Database and derived analysis 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    Eleven KMT2A-rearranged lines, AML-weighted, none infant-derived. A difference of +0.006 is indistinguishable from zero and should be read as 'no signal', not as evidence of equality.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • SCAN CONFOUND: this number comes from the project's genome-wide KMT2A-selectivity scan, whose index arm is MYELOID-ENRICHED (8 AML lines against 5 B-ALL). A gene whose requirement differs by lineage is mis-scored in BOTH directions by that design — CEBPA ranks 25 genome-wide with no dependency at all in KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL, and conversely a gene required in one lineage and not the other can average to apparent non-selectivity. See `ana-lineage-confound-myeloid-tf-dependencies`. RNF40's -0.520 against the comparator is also close to the pan-essential range, so the more likely reading is a broadly required gene with little KMT2A-specific margin rather than a selective dependency the scan failed to resolve. Oncofusion knowledge graph (internal analysis) 2026
  5. E5moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.database

    UniProt O75150 records a single subcellular location for RNF40, Nucleus, resting on one coded experimental citation (PubMed:10944455), and HPA immunofluorescence independently gives a single main location, Nucleoplasm, at reliability Supported.

    What this evidence cannot show

    One coded citation is thin for a protein with a thousand residues and a defined chromatin function. Brief rule 91: PMID 10944455 is a retinoblastoma-binding paper about 'RBP95', not a localisation study, so the annotation is a pointer rather than a source. No subnuclear resolution in either record.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • A bare 'Nucleus' record does not anticipate what RNF40 is actually reported to do. Loss of RNF40 decreases NF-kB activity in colorectal cancer cells and reduces colitis burden in mice - a signalling-pathway output, not a chromatin-mark output - which means the protein's functional footprint extends beyond the compartment its one-line record describes. Either RNF40 acts on NF-kB from chromatin, in which case the interesting fact is which loci, or it has a role the record does not capture at all; the record cannot distinguish them. J Crohns Colitis 2019
  6. E6strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    RNF20 and RNF40 are required in mouse B cells for homologous recombination and for class switch recombination, and DNA double-strand breaks raise global H2Bub without raising H3K4me3 or H3K79me2.

    What this evidence cannot show

    Mouse B cells, no human data, no KMT2A fusion. Read at abstract level. The experiments treat RNF20 and RNF40 largely as a unit, which is biologically defensible for an obligate heterodimer but means the RNF40-specific contribution is not separated. The H3K79me2 non-response is reported for the DSB context only and should not be generalised.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The attribution to RNF40 specifically is not established by this experiment, which treats RNF20 and RNF40 largely as one unit - defensible for an obligate heterodimer and inadequate for a gene-level claim. That the two are separable is shown elsewhere: RNF40 loss has its own phenotype in colorectal epithelium and colitis, where the readout is NF-kB activity rather than H2Bub-dependent repair. Until an RNF40-only allele is tested in B cells, the B-lineage record here is a record about the heterodimer. J Crohns Colitis 2019
  7. E7moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.database

    Human Protein Atlas v25.1 assigns RNF40 the single main subcellular location Nucleoplasm at reliability Supported and records it as detected in all immune cell types with low immune cell specificity.

    What this evidence cannot show

    Antibody immunofluorescence in non-haematopoietic lines. 'Nucleoplasm' in HPA's vocabulary is the absence of a resolved substructure, not a positive statement that RNF40 avoids nucleoli, speckles or bodies. Blood Atlas values are RNA.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • 'Nucleoplasm only' is the default output when an antibody resolves no substructure, so it must not be read as positive evidence that RNF40 avoids nucleoli, speckles or bodies - which is how a bare subcellular field will be read. The only spatial information anyone has for this protein is the genomic distribution of the mark it deposits, H2Bub120 across transcribed gene bodies, and a mark distribution is not an image. The absence recorded in this entry is therefore an absence of resolution, not a demonstration of homogeneity. Mol Cell Biol 2019
Connected to