Oncofusion

start / graph / pt-story-neonatal-all-kmt2a-mllt3-leukaemia-cutis

Patient storymoderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.Q-patient-stories

Skin first, blood later: a three-day-old referred for purple spots, with KMT2A::MLLT3 neonatal ALL

also called blueberry muffin baby t(9;11) case · neonatal ALL MLL-AF9 case

A newborn who seemed completely well was referred at three days old because of purple, non-fading marks on his face and shoulder; his blood count was normal and no leukaemia cells could be found in it. A skin biopsy on day seven showed the leukaemia, the marks faded and then came back everywhere, and by day 24 his white cell count had climbed to 125,700 - he was treated with chemotherapy and a stem cell transplant and was well at two years old.

The same thing, for a scientist

A 3-day-old male newborn, delivered at term after an uneventful pregnancy, was referred to neonatal intensive care with multiple purple-to-violaceous, non-blanching macules several millimetres across on the face, upper back and right shoulder, only a few slightly elevated. The complete blood count was normal (leucocytes 13,980/uL, Hb 16.0 g/dL, platelets 256,000/uL) and the peripheral smear showed no leukaemic blasts; liver and spleen were normal on ultrasound; congenital infection, haemolytic disease and sepsis were excluded. Skin biopsy on day 7 showed leukaemic blasts. Marrow on day 7 was non-diagnostic; the smear on day 14 and marrow aspirate on day 16 confirmed ALL. Flow cytometry showed a CD19+CD45+CD22+CD79a+ population negative for CD10, CD20, CD34 and TdT, and molecular analysis confirmed the KMT2A::MLLT3 (MLL-AF9) transcript from t(9;11). CSF had fewer than 5 leucocytes/uL but cytospin showed blasts, giving CNS2a status. The skin lesions regressed spontaneously, then recurred on day 13 with dissemination over the whole integument, and the leucocyte count rose to a peak of 125,700/uL on day 24. He was a poor prednisone responder, reached morphological remission at the end of induction with persisting MRD, and proceeded to an unrelated 10/10 HLA-matched, DP-permissive allograft after fludarabine, thiotepa, melphalan and ATG. He was MRD-negative for 15 months after transplant and in good condition at age 2. [E1]

Go deeper
How it began1 deeper

With the skin, and with nothing else. The report describes an apparently healthy newborn referred at 3 days of life for multiple purple-to-violaceous, non-blanching macules a few millimetres across on his face, upper back and right shoulder; only a few lesions were slightly raised 1. The pregnancy had been uneventful and the family history unremarkable for skin and blood disease.

Everything else was normal. The blood count was normal for age. The smear showed 30% neutrophils, 57% lymphocytes, 9% monocytes, a few pro- and metamyelocytes - and no blasts. Liver and spleen were normal in size on ultrasound, fundoscopy showed no chorioretinitis or haematopoietic foci, parvovirus B19 and CMV PCR were negative, and so were the Coombs test and red-cell membrane and enzyme assays. He was negative for neonatal sepsis 1.

So at the moment of referral there was no anaemia, no organomegaly, no bleeding and no leukaemic blood picture: only the skin. This is the aleukaemic presentation that concept-leukemia-cutis-infant describes, seen from the cot side.

What the lesions actually looked like, and why that matters

The authors note that the lesions were unusual: concentrated on the face and mainly macular, rather than the papular and nodular morphology described in most previous neonatal leukaemia reports 1. The blueberry-muffin label attaches to a look, and the look here was at the flatter end of it.

The differential is the one concept-leukemia-cutis-infant lists - congenital infection, neonatal haemolytic disease, and infiltrative processes other than leukaemia - and in this child each was excluded by a specific test rather than by impression.

What was found

Skin biopsy on day 7 made the diagnosis. Marrow on day 7 did not. The bone marrow examination on day 7 was non-diagnostic; it took a peripheral smear on day 14 and a marrow aspirate on day 16 to confirm neonatal ALL 1.

Flow cytometry on peripheral blood showed a monomorphic lymphoid blast population positive for CD19, CD45, CD22 and CD79a and negative for CD10, CD20, CD34 and TdT. The authors call this an aberrant phenotype: CD19 and CD79a fix the lineage, and the absence of CD10 is the CD10-negative pro-B pattern of concept-flow-cytometry-immunophenotype-kmt2a-r, but the absence of CD34 and TdT is not what most KMT2A-rearranged infant ALL looks like. A discrepancy is recorded and left unexplained: marrow blasts were TdT-negative in two independent laboratories, while blasts in the skin biopsy were TdT-positive 1.

Molecular analysis confirmed the KMT2A::MLLT3 (MLL-AF9) fusion transcript arising from t(9;11), and excluded a GATA1 mutation - the test that separates true neonatal leukaemia from transient abnormal myelopoiesis (concept-molecular-confirmation-fusion-transcript).

CSF contained fewer than 5 leucocytes/uL, but the cytospin showed leukaemic blasts, giving a CNS status of CNS2a - low-level CNS involvement detectable only because someone spun the fluid (concept-cns-involvement-at-diagnosis).

What was done and what happened

The skin lesions regressed spontaneously over several days, then reappeared on day 13 and spread over the entire integument. The leucocyte count climbed steadily, peaking at 125,700/uL on day 24 - crossing into hyperleukocytosis (concept-hyperleukocytosis-emergency) roughly three weeks after a normal count 1.

Treatment was deliberately deferred. An interdisciplinary neonatology and paediatric-oncology team started the prednisone pre-phase of the ALL-BFM protocol on day 24, explicitly to avoid neonatal toxicity. Response was poor: a poor prednisone responder at day 8, more than 10% blasts in the marrow at day 15, morphological remission at day 33 with MRD still detectable.

Subsequent therapy was steered by serial PCR-MRD with the aim of reaching MRD below 10^-4 before transplant. He received an allograft from an unrelated donor matched 10/10 at high resolution and permissive at HLA-DP, conditioned with fludarabine, thiotepa, melphalan and ATG because of his age - a non-total-body-irradiation regimen (concept-hsct-in-kmt2a-r-leukemia). Post-transplant surveillance was PCR-MRD on marrow every 6-8 weeks, so that a rising MRD could be met with a bispecific or conjugated antibody before frank relapse.

Outcome as reported: MRD-negative for 15 months after transplant, alive and in excellent clinical condition at 2 years of age. The report does not state the outcome beyond that point.

Why this case is in the graph

concept-leukemia-cutis-infant says that cutaneous infiltrate may precede other manifestations by up to four months and that a firm nodular eruption in a neonate warrants biopsy even with a normal blood count. This case is what that sentence costs and buys.

Four things a category entry cannot convey:

  1. The marrow can be negative while the skin is diagnostic. Day 7 marrow: non-diagnostic. Day 7 skin biopsy: leukaemic blasts. If the biopsy had not been done, the diagnosis would have waited for day 14-16.
  2. Spontaneous regression is real and is not remission. The lesions faded, then came back disseminated, and the white count went to 125,700/uL.
  3. The clone was tissue-resident while marrow and blood looked normal. For a fusion thought to arise in utero, this is a natural experiment in latency, and it happened in a child who was four days old.
  4. Treating a neonate is a decision, not a reflex. Therapy was withheld until day 24 to avoid neonatal toxicity, and that delay was a judgement made while the counts climbed.

It is also the graph's one long-ish survivor of neonatal disease. A reader who has read only the outcome statistics should see that the 2-year-old exists.

Facts and figures
age at dx3 days at referral; diagnosis established day 7 (skin) and days 14-16 (blood and marrow)
sex as reportedmale
fusionfusion-kmt2a-mllt3
karyotypet(9;11); KMT2A::MLLT3 (MLL-AF9) transcript confirmed molecularly
cns statusCNS2a - fewer than 5 leucocytes/uL in CSF but blasts present on cytospin
coursediagnosis by skin biopsy day 7 after a non-diagnostic day-7 marrow; ALL-BFM prednisone pre-phase deferred to day 24 to limit neonatal toxicity; poor prednisone response at day 8; day-15 marrow above 10% blasts; morphological remission day 33 with persistent MRD; PCR-MRD-guided therapy to below 10^-4; unrelated 10/10 HLA-matched DP-permissive allograft conditioned with fludarabine, thiotepa, melphalan and ATG; PCR-MRD surveillance every 6-8 weeks after transplant
outcomeMRD-negative for 15 months after transplant, alive and in excellent clinical condition at 2 years of age; no later follow-up reported
source typecase report
consent notePublished peer-reviewed case report. This entry records only what the publication discloses and deliberately omits the birth weight and the treating institution, because combining those with an exact age in days, sex and year would narrow identity beyond what the clinical teaching requires.
privacy reviewNo detail added, inferred or reconstructed beyond the publication. No narrative has been written about the child beyond the reported course.
presentation
[
  "multiple purple-to-violaceous non-blanching macules several millimetres across on face, upper back and right shoulder",
  "only a few lesions slightly elevated; mainly macular rather than nodular",
  "otherwise apparently healthy; no organomegaly, no anaemia, no petechiae at referral",
  "spontaneous regression of lesions, then recurrence on day 13 with dissemination over the whole integument"
]
labs at presentation
{
  "wbc_per_uL": 13980,
  "haemoglobin_g_per_dL": 16,
  "haematocrit_pct": 54,
  "platelets_per_uL": 256000,
  "blasts_on_smear": "none at presentation",
  "wbc_peak_per_uL": 125700,
  "wbc_peak_day": 24
}
immunophenotype positive
[
  "CD19",
  "CD45",
  "CD22",
  "CD79a"
]
immunophenotype negative
[
  "CD10",
  "CD20",
  "CD34",
  "TdT (marrow; TdT positive in skin biopsy)"
]
excluded differentials
[
  "neonatal sepsis",
  "parvovirus B19",
  "CMV",
  "haemolytic disease (Coombs, red-cell membrane and enzyme assays)",
  "transient abnormal myelopoiesis (GATA1 mutation absent)"
]
How this could bite us back
  • Skin is a large, poorly perfused compartment. A systemic agent that clears marrow and blood may leave dermal infiltrate behind, and marrow MRD monitoring - the exact strategy used successfully here - would not see it.
  • Spontaneous regression of the skin lesions in this child would have been indistinguishable, for several days, from a treatment response. Any single-arm study using cutaneous response as a readout in neonates inherits that confound.
  • Deferring therapy to avoid neonatal toxicity is itself a risk: the white count rose from normal to 125,700/uL during the deferral, and the child became a poor prednisone responder. A targeted agent tolerable in the first week of life would change this calculus, and none is licensed at that age.
Still open
  1. In aleukaemic neonatal leukaemia cutis the clone is viable and tissue-resident while marrow and blood are normal. What holds it in the dermis, and does that state share a transcriptional programme with the pre-leukaemic clone detectable on neonatal blood spots in later-onset infant ALL?
  2. Blasts were TdT-positive in skin and TdT-negative in marrow in the same child. Is compartment-dependent TdT expression a general property of KMT2A-rearranged blasts in extramedullary sites, and does it confound MRD assays calibrated on marrow?
  3. The lesions regressed spontaneously before recurring. Was that immune clearance, and if so against what antigen - a question that bears directly on whether KMT2A-rearranged blasts present anything targetable.
  4. How long should treatment be deferred in a well neonate with biopsy-proven leukaemia cutis and normal counts? This case waited 24 days and the count reached 125,700/uL; no trial addresses the question and no registry has been asked.
Every source behind this entry (1)
  1. E1moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper

    A 3-day-old male newborn was referred with purple non-blanching macules on the face, upper back and right shoulder, a normal blood count and no blasts on the smear; congenital infection, haemolysis and sepsis were excluded; skin biopsy on day 7 showed leukaemic blasts while marrow on day 7 was non-diagnostic, with ALL confirmed on the day-14 smear and day-16 marrow; blasts were CD19+CD45+CD22+CD79a+ and CD10-, CD20-, CD34-, TdT-negative in marrow but TdT-positive in skin; KMT2A::MLLT3 (MLL-AF9) from t(9;11) was confirmed and GATA1 mutation excluded; CSF cytospin showed blasts (CNS2a); the lesions regressed then recurred on day 13 with the leucocyte count peaking at 125,700/uL on day 24; ALL-BFM prednisone pre-phase began on day 24 with poor prednisone response and day-15 marrow above 10% blasts; morphological remission at day 33 with persistent MRD; unrelated 10/10 HLA-matched DP-permissive allograft after fludarabine, thiotepa, melphalan and ATG; MRD-negative 15 months after transplant and in excellent condition at age 2.

    What this evidence cannot show

    Full text read (PubMed Central, PMC7603802), not abstract only. A single case report: it says nothing about frequency, and publication bias selects for the unusual in both directions here - the aleukaemic skin-first presentation and the good outcome are each part of why this case was written up, so it must not be read as the typical course of neonatal leukaemia, whose reported survival is poor. Follow-up ends at age 2 with 15 months of post-transplant MRD negativity; no later outcome is available. The report does not state the KMT2A breakpoint intron, so the fusion is recorded at gene level only. The TdT discrepancy between marrow and skin blasts is reported without explanation and the authors say so. This entry omits the birth weight and the treating institution given in the paper, as identifying detail that adds nothing clinically.

    Evidence that argues against this (2)
    • Against generalising this outcome: reported survival in congenital and neonatal leukaemia is poor - the case report of a fatal congenital KMT2A-rearranged AML cites 23% and 26% survival in two large studies, and the prognosis of neonatal ALL is described in this paper's own discussion as guarded. source 2015
    • Against reading skin involvement as near-universal in congenital leukaemia: a systematic review of the world literature that set out to test the commonly quoted 50% figure concluded that specific cutaneous infiltrates occur in 25-30% of congenital leukaemia, so a skin-first presentation is a minority route even in neonates. source 1993
Connected to