FANCG — FA core complex; rank 27 of 8,269 for KMT2A-selective dependency, and no KMT2A literature at all
also called FANCG · XRCC9 · O15287
FANCG is part of a cellular repair crew that fixes DNA when the copying machinery gets stuck. A screen run by this project found that leukaemia cells carrying the KMT2A fusion need it more than other leukaemia cells do — and nobody has ever published a paper on this gene in KMT2A leukaemia, so the finding is genuinely new and genuinely unconfirmed.
The same thing, for a scientist
FANCG (UniProt O15287, 622 aa, primary gene name asserted against the accession) sits in the FA core complex — the TPR-repeat subunit of the FANCA-FANCG-FAAP20 arm. It entered this graph through a DepMap sweep in which the 26-gene FA/BRCA annotation beats a permutation null at p = 5e-05, FANCG ranking 27 of 8,269 by raw effect (d = -0.264) [E2]. Re-testing here: the depletion is present in BOTH lineage halves (-0.3427 myeloid, -0.2645 lymphoid) and stronger in the myeloid one, uniquely in this set; it survives a line-label permutation that preserves subunit correlations (p = 0.0008); and FANCG is not pan-essential (mean Chronos -0.0905 across all screened lines) [E3][E4]. Three things cut against it. Non-KMT2A B-ALL lines show about half the same effect, so a large part of this is B-lymphoid lineage rather than KMT2A rearrangement [E3]. The obligate FA core subunits do NOT move together, which is hard to reconcile with a canonical pathway dependency. And Fanconi anaemia patients, who have no FA pathway at all, nonetheless develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia [E7].
What the protein does, and which part of the pathway it sits in
Module: FA core complex — the TPR-repeat subunit of the FANCA-FANCG-FAAP20 arm.
UniProt describes FANCG as a DNA repair protein implicated in interstrand cross-link repair and chromosome stability and a candidate tumour suppressor, within the multisubunit FA core complex 1.
Why the module matters for reading the DepMap result: the FA core complex is an obligate multi-subunit ubiquitin ligase whose only well-established job is to monoubiquitinate the FANCD2-FANCI (ID2) heterodimer. If the dependency seen here were the canonical pathway working as a unit, every obligate core subunit and the ID2 substrate should move together. They do not — see mech-fa-core-complex-heterogeneity-kmt2a. That is the single most important caveat on this entry and it is not a small one.
How this gene entered the graph, and the numbers
FANCG was not found in the literature. It was found by a scan, and then by a pathway permutation over a gene set fixed before any result was read 2.
| statistic | value |
|---|---|
| rank by raw effect, 8,269-gene sweep | 27 |
| rank by scaled z | 12 |
| d (Chronos difference), whole index arm | -0.264 |
| d, myeloid half | -0.3427 |
| d, lymphoid half | -0.2645 |
| z, myeloid half | -1.638 |
| z, lymphoid half | -1.264 |
| pan-cancer Chronos, all screened lines | -0.0905 |
| fraction of all lines below -0.5 | 4.6% |
| line-label permutation p | 0.0008 |
Two of those rows carry most of the weight. The lineage split 3 is the one the project asked for, and the answer is not the one the myeloid-artefact worry predicted: this gene is the exception in the set — it is depleted more in the myeloid half, where the other seven headline genes are stronger in the lymphoid half. The line-label permutation 3 is the answer to the complex-correlation objection: redrawing which lines are the index arm, with the gene set held fixed and the 7-myeloid/4-lymphoid composition reproduced, preserves every correlation between subunits, and the observed depletion still sits at p = 0.0008.
And FANCG is not pan-essential 4, which is the filter that removed most of the earlier scan's contaminants.
The published literature, and a counted absence
On FANCG in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia there is nothing. 5 The exact query and the title-checked count are in the evidence item; aliases searched were FANCG, XRCC9.
On FANCG in leukaemia at all, 33 records. 6
And the counter-direction. Human FA patients develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia 7. A cell that has lost the FA pathway entirely can still acquire a KMT2A fusion and expand into a clinical leukaemia, which rules out the strongest reading of the DepMap result — that KMT2A-rearranged cells REQUIRE this pathway — and leaves only the quantitative one.
| uniprot | O15287 |
|---|---|
| length AA | 622 |
| uniprot resolution | gene_exact:FANCG AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true; primary gene name read back as FANCG; length 622 aa checked against the entry |
| fa module | FA core complex — the TPR-repeat subunit of the FANCA-FANCG-FAAP20 arm |
| subnuclear localization | NOT MEASURED FOR FANCG ITSELF, AND THE FA PATHWAY'S SUBNUCLEAR CURRENCY BELONGS TO A DIFFERENT PROTEIN. The canonical subnuclear readout of this pathway is monoubiquitinated FANCD2/FANCI assembling into nuclear FOCI at damage sites; FANCG's job is upstream of that, as part of the core complex that installs the mark. No focus, body, matrix or chromatin-fraction measurement of FANCG was found in this beat. What IS established, and is a subnuclear-adjacent mechanism rather than an address, is that FANCG CONTROLS ANOTHER SUBUNIT'S NUCLEAR ACCUMULATION: FANCG binds directly to the amino-terminal NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE of FANCA, and correcting an FA-G cell line restores FANCA/FANCG binding, prolongs FANCA's half-life and INCREASES NUCLEAR ACCUMULATION of the FA protein complex [E_q77_loc3]. So for FANCG the interesting spatial fact is not where it is but what it moves. |
| shown for fusion | NO - nobody has looked in any fusion, and for this gene the absence is total rather than specific to localisation. This entry already records that no published literature on FANCG in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia exists on a title-checked alias-expanded search. The gap is conspicuous because the project's own genome-wide scan ranks FANCG 75 of 17,728 for KMT2A selectivity. |
essentiality
{
"depmap_common_essential": false,
"chronos_mean": -0.0905,
"frac_lines_below_minus_0_5": 0.046
}depmap kmt2a selectivity
{
"chronos_mean_kmt2a_rearranged": -0.463,
"chronos_mean_other_leukaemia": -0.1463,
"difference": -0.3168,
"pan_essentiality_all_lines": -0.0905,
"selectivity_rank": 75,
"rank_denominator": 17728,
"provenance": "Joined 2026-09-21 from analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full (generated 2026-09-19T10:12:06Z), the project's own genome-wide scan over 11 KMT2A-rearranged and 43 other leukaemia DepMap lines. NOT re-fetched and NOT independent of that scan: every caveat it carries applies here, including that the KMT2A-rearranged arm is a small number of lines drawn from nine individuals, that the rank denominator is 17,728 genes, and that a difference is not a dependency. Added because only 26 of 308 gene entries carried this number, which made any KMT2A-selectivity question answerable for 8% of the corpus.",
"how_to_read": "A negative difference means MORE required in KMT2A-rearranged lines than in other leukaemia lines. A rank near 17,728 is ANTI-selective. Neither is evidence of a fusion-driven dependency on its own: check pan_essentiality_all_lines before calling anything selective, and note that a paralogue-redundant gene can score near zero for reasons that have nothing to do with this disease - see ana-the-paralogue-redundancy-excuse-is-not-tested-and-my-proxy-decided-the-answer."
}literature
{
"kmt2a_records_raw": 5,
"kmt2a_records_title_checked": 1,
"leukaemia_records": 33,
"aliases_searched": [
"FANCG",
"XRCC9"
],
"kmt2a_query": "(KMT2A[tiab] OR MLL[tiab] OR \"mixed-lineage leukemia\"[tiab]) AND (FANCF[tiab] OR FANCA[tiab] OR FAA[tiab] OR FACA[tiab] OR FANCH[tiab] OR FANCG[tiab] OR XRCC9[tiab])",
"leukaemia_query": "(FANCG[tiab] OR XRCC9[tiab]) AND (leukemia[tiab] OR leukaemia[tiab])"
}localization
{
"subcellular": "NUCLEUS AND CYTOPLASM, WITH THE NUCLEAR FORM MAJOR - AND THE ONLY CODED CITATION IS NOT A LOCALISATION STUDY. UniProt O15287 fetched 2026-09-21 annotates 'Nucleus' and 'Cytoplasm', both at ECO:0000269 and both citing the SAME single reference, PubMed:18550849, which is a paper identifying HES1 as an interactor of the FA core complex [E_q77_loc2]. The partition statement - 'The major form is nuclear. The minor form is cytoplasmic' - is carried in an UNCODED note [E_q77_loc1]. The founding observations that FANCG is a component of a NUCLEAR complex with FANCA and FANCC, and that FANCG drives the complex's nuclear accumulation, are in two 1999-2000 papers that the record does not cite [E_q77_loc3].",
"subnuclear": "NOT MEASURED FOR FANCG ITSELF, AND THE FA PATHWAY'S SUBNUCLEAR CURRENCY BELONGS TO A DIFFERENT PROTEIN. The canonical subnuclear readout of this pathway is monoubiquitinated FANCD2/FANCI assembling into nuclear FOCI at damage sites; FANCG's job is upstream of that, as part of the core complex that installs the mark. No focus, body, matrix or chromatin-fraction measurement of FANCG was found in this beat. What IS established, and is a subnuclear-adjacent mechanism rather than an address, is that FANCG CONTROLS ANOTHER SUBUNIT'S NUCLEAR ACCUMULATION: FANCG binds directly to the amino-terminal NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE of FANCA, and correcting an FA-G cell line restores FANCA/FANCG binding, prolongs FANCA's half-life and INCREASES NUCLEAR ACCUMULATION of the FA protein complex [E_q77_loc3]. So for FANCG the interesting spatial fact is not where it is but what it moves.",
"how_shown": "co-immunoprecipitation and complex characterisation for the HES1 interaction [E_q77_loc2]; complementation of FA-G and FA-A cell lines with half-life and nuclear-accumulation readouts, plus binding mapping to FANCA's N-terminal NLS [E_q77_loc3]",
"systems": "human FA patient-derived and corrected lymphoblast and fibroblast lines. Haematopoietic in origin for some of the FA lines, which is better than most of this tranche - but NOT leukaemic, NOT fusion-bearing and NOT a primary blast.",
"shown_for_fusion_localisation": "NO - nobody has looked in any fusion. This entry already records that there is NO published literature on FANCG in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia at all - 5 records raw, 1 substantive after title-checking, and zero for FANCG or XRCC9 alone against KMT2A or MLL. A localisation measurement in a fusion context is therefore absent for the same reason everything else is: nobody has studied this gene in this disease, despite its rank of 75 of 17,728 in the project's own selectivity scan.",
"node": "localization-chromatin-bound-versus-soluble-fraction-kmt2a",
"the_rule_91_case_here_is_a_replaceable_citation": "Unlike the MED26 or STAG2 cases in this tranche, where the experimental record is simply absent from the database, FANCG's problem is a REPLACEABLE POINTER. UniProt's sole experimental citation for both of FANCG's compartments is a 2008 HES1 interaction paper, while two papers from 1999 and 2000 establish that FANCG is a component of a functional NUCLEAR complex and that it promotes the complex's nuclear accumulation by binding FANCA's NLS. Brief rule 91 item 3 asks that the founding observation be named when it differs from the database's, and this entry names it."
}cell type
{
"evidence_class_key": "concept-expressed-required-maintains-three-evidence-classes",
"identifier_note": "FANCG is O15287, 622 aa, synonym XRCC9. data/symbol-collisions.json was grepped for FANCG and XRCC9 before the first query and has NO row for either; none is proposed. This entry's existing literature block already records that the alias XRCC9 was searched, which is the relevant discipline for a gene whose 1990s literature is indexed under the old symbol.",
"expressed_in": {
"class": 1,
"summary": "ubiquitous; not pan-essential (mean Chronos -0.0905, 4.6% of lines below -0.5, per this entry's own [E4]). The cell type that matters for FA biology is the haematopoietic stem and progenitor compartment, and it matters because of what happens when the pathway is lost, not because of where the gene is expressed."
},
"required_in": {
"class": 2,
"claim": "IN HUMANS, LOSS OF THE FANCONI ANAEMIA PATHWAY - OF WHICH FANCG IS A CORE-COMPLEX SUBUNIT - PRODUCES A PROFOUND HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM AND PROGENITOR CELL DEFECT THAT IS PRESENT BEFORE CLINICAL MARROW FAILURE. In FA patients, HSPCs are profoundly depleted before the onset of clinical bone-marrow failure; in response to replicative stress and unresolved DNA damage, p53 is HYPERACTIVATED in FA cells and triggers a late p21-dependent G0/G1 CELL-CYCLE ARREST; and knocking down p53 RESCUES the HSPC defect in several in vitro and in vivo models including human FA and FA-like cells [E_q77_ct1].",
"pmids": [
"22683204"
],
"system_named_in_the_claim": "HUMAN Fanconi anaemia patient haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, plus in vitro and in vivo FA-like models - human primary material, no fusion",
"nodes": [
"cell-type-hsc-bone-marrow"
],
"the_pathway_versus_the_subunit": "Brief rule 64 in the direction that usually gets forgotten: this is a PATHWAY result, not a FANCG result. The cohort is Fanconi anaemia patients across complementation groups, and nothing here isolates FANCG. It is recorded as the cell-type answer for this entry because the core complex is obligate - FANCG is required for FANCA and FANCC to bind at all - and because there is no FANCG-specific haematopoietic experiment in existence."
},
"context": "human FA patients and FA-like models; no fusion and no leukaemia in the cited work"
}cell state
{
"evidence_class_key": "concept-expressed-required-maintains-three-evidence-classes",
"maintains_state": {
"class": 3,
"states": [
"cell-state-replication-stress-icl-repair",
"cell-state-quiescence"
],
"claim": "LOSING THE FA PATHWAY DOES NOT KILL A PROGENITOR - IT ARRESTS IT, AND THE ARREST IS p53/p21-DEPENDENT AND REVERSIBLE. In human FA cells, replicative stress and unresolved DNA damage hyperactivate p53, which triggers a LATE p21-dependent G0/G1 arrest; p53 knockdown rescues the HSPC defect [E_q77_ct1]. So the state is an exacerbated but physiological damage response rather than a repair catastrophe, and the arrest is the pathogenic event.",
"pmids": [
"22683204"
],
"system_named_in_the_claim": "human FA patient HSPCs and FA-like in vitro and in vivo models - no fusion"
},
"why_this_bears_on_the_scan_hit": "This entry exists because FANCG ranks 75 of 17,728 for KMT2A-selective dependency in the project's own scan. A CRISPR proliferation screen scores a p53/p21-dependent G0/G1 arrest as depletion, indistinguishably from killing - and FA pathway loss produces exactly that arrest. So the mechanism behind the scan signal may be an arrest rather than a vulnerability, which matters therapeutically: a drug that arrests blasts through p53 is a different proposition from one that kills them, and KMT2A-rearranged lines' p53 status varies. This graph's TP53 entry records that TP53 is effectively absent at diagnosis in infants and enriched at relapse, which predicts that any FA-pathway-directed effect would WEAKEN in relapsed disease. That prediction is testable in existing DepMap data by splitting lines on TP53 status and has not been run.",
"confidence": "moderate",
"caveats": "The cell-type and cell-state evidence is PATHWAY-level across Fanconi anaemia complementation groups, not FANCG-specific, and this entry's own analysis already notes that the obligate FA core subunits do NOT move together in the DepMap data - which is hard to reconcile with a canonical pathway dependency and equally hard to reconcile with treating a pathway result as a subunit result. No fusion anywhere. And this entry's [E7] is the standing objection to the whole line: Fanconi anaemia patients, who have no FA pathway at all, nonetheless develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia.",
"counter_evidence": [
{
"note": "The decisive counter-argument to any FA-pathway requirement in this disease is already in this entry at [E7] and it is a human observation, not a model: Fanconi anaemia patients are biallelically null for an FA gene and still develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia - a documented therapy-related AML carrying MLL-CBP t(11;16) in a child with FA. If the pathway were required for KMT2A-rearranged leukaemogenesis, that case could not exist. The DepMap signal must therefore be about maintenance of established lines rather than about initiation, and the two are routinely conflated.",
"citation": {
"title": "Fanconi anemia proteins FANCA, FANCC, and FANCG/XRCC9 interact in a functional nuclear complex.",
"authors": "Garcia-Higuera I, Kuang Y, Näf D, Wasik J, D'Andrea AD",
"year": 1999,
"venue": "Mol Cell Biol",
"pmid": "10373536",
"doi": "10.1128/MCB.19.7.4866",
"type": "paper"
}
}
]
}- The FA pathway is a tumour suppressor pathway. Inhibiting it in a leukaemia patient would be expected to raise, not lower, the mutation rate in surviving cells and in normal haematopoiesis — the exact phenotype Fanconi anaemia patients have.
- Fanconi anaemia is a bone-marrow-failure syndrome. A systemic inhibitor of this pathway carries a named, well-characterised on-target toxicity in the tissue the disease lives in.
- Children cured of leukaemia live for decades. A drug that disables interstrand cross-link repair sits badly beside the secondary-malignancy risk that already follows topoisomerase-II-directed therapy for KMT2A-rearranged disease.
- FANCG has no reported small-molecule ligand, and only UBE2T among the eight carries a catalytic site of the kind ligand discovery usually needs.
- A quarter-Chronos difference is a narrow therapeutic window even if it is real.
- Is FANCG depleted in KMT2A-rearranged cells because of replication stress at transcribed loci, because of endogenous aldehyde damage as the ALDH2 work in AML argues, or for a third reason?
- Does FANCG knockout cause measurable fork slowing or R-loop accumulation in a KMT2A-rearranged line, or only loss of viability?
- Is the B-lymphoid component of this signal a property of B-ALL biology, or of the nine non-KMT2A B-ALL lines that happen to be in DepMap?
- Do primary KMT2A-rearranged blasts or patient-derived xenografts show the same FANCG requirement, or is it a property of decades-passaged lines?
- E1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database
FANCG is UniProt O15287, 622 aa, and the accession's PRIMARY gene name reads back as FANCG. UniProt describes FANCG as a DNA repair protein implicated in interstrand cross-link repair and chromosome stability and a candidate tumour suppressor, within the multisubunit FA core complex.
UniProtKB entry O15287 · UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot 2026What this evidence cannot show
A database record, not an experiment. The accession was resolved by a gene_exact query and then read back: gene_exact matches SYNONYMS, so the primary gene name and the sequence length were both checked against the entry rather than assumed.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- UniProt function text for the FA core subunits is hedged ('may operate in', 'may be implicated in') and largely predates the structural work on the complex; it should not be read as a precise mechanistic claim. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot 2026
- E2moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.dataset
In the project's own genome-scale sweep, FANCG ranks 27 of 8,269 by raw effect (d = -0.264) and 12 by the scaled z (-1.267), and the 26-gene FA/BRCA set as a whole beats its permutation null at p = 5e-05 on both statistics.
Effect-size versus z re-ranking of the genome-scale lineage-consistency sweep, with a permutation test of the Fanconi/FA-BRCA pathway · Oncofusion knowledge graph, analyses/effect-size-vs-z-reranking; DepMap Chronos via Open Targets 2026What this evidence cannot show
DepMap CRISPR gene effect in 11 KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia lines against 43 other leukaemia lines. Eleven immortalised lines, none infant-derived, lineage assigned from DepMap free-text disease strings. A rank is not an effect: d here is a Chronos difference of roughly a quarter to a half, which is real but far from the -0.86 of MEN1.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The gene-set permutation treats physically interacting subunits as independent draws and is anti-conservative for any complex. The sweep's own caveat says so. That objection is answered in E3, not here. Oncofusion knowledge graph, analyses/effect-size-vs-z-reranking; DepMap Chronos via Open Targets 2026
- E3moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.dataset
Splitting the index arm, FANCG is depleted in BOTH halves (d = -0.3427 myeloid, -0.2645 lymphoid; z = -1.638 and -1.264), and the myeloid half is the stronger one. A line-label permutation that holds the gene set fixed and redraws the index arm as 7 myeloid + 4 lymphoid leukaemia lines gives p = 0.0008 for FANCG, and p = 0.0002 for the eight-gene headline set.
Is the Fanconi signal lineage-wide, fusion-specific, and separable from pan-essentiality? Lineage-split, subtype-control and line-label permutation re-test of the FA/BRCA enrichment · Oncofusion knowledge graph, analyses/fa-pathway-lineage-and-fusion-specificity; DepMap Chronos via Open Targets 2026What this evidence cannot show
The lymphoid half is four cell lines. The line-label permutation is the right null for correlated subunits because it preserves every gene-gene correlation, but it cannot tell a KMT2A effect from anything else those eleven particular lines share.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- Non-KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL lines show the same FA enrichment at p = 5e-05, with the eight headline genes averaging -0.196 against -0.356 in the KMT2A-rearranged arm. Roughly half the effect is B-lymphoid lineage, not KMT2A rearrangement. Oncofusion knowledge graph, analyses/fa-pathway-lineage-and-fusion-specificity; DepMap Chronos via Open Targets 2026
- E4moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.dataset
FANCG is not pan-essential: mean Chronos across every screened cell line is -0.0905, and only 4.6% of lines fall below -0.5. For contrast ACTB is -0.815 with 72.1%.
Is the Fanconi signal lineage-wide, fusion-specific, and separable from pan-essentiality? Lineage-split, subtype-control and line-label permutation re-test of the FA/BRCA enrichment · Oncofusion knowledge graph, analyses/fa-pathway-lineage-and-fusion-specificity; DepMap Chronos via Open Targets 2026What this evidence cannot show
Computed from the Open Targets slice of DepMap, which does not state its release version. 'Not pan-essential' is a weaker statement than 'selective': a gene can be non-essential everywhere and still not be selectively required in KMT2A-rearranged cells.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- A shallow dependency is easy to call selective and hard to drug. A difference of a quarter of a Chronos unit on a baseline near zero may not translate into any therapeutic window. Oncofusion knowledge graph, analyses/fa-pathway-lineage-and-fusion-specificity; DepMap Chronos via Open Targets 2026
- E5strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.database
There is no published literature on FANCG in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia. A PubMed title/abstract search including the retired and alternative symbols FANCG, XRCC9 against KMT2A, MLL and 'mixed-lineage leukemia' returns 5 records, of which 1 is substantive after title-checking every hit. The joint query is shared with FANCA and FANCF; no hit mentions FANCG in a KMT2A-rearranged context, and FANCG or XRCC9 alone against KMT2A or MLL returns zero.
PubMed counted absence search for FANCG against KMT2A/MLL, run 2026-09-20 with aliases and title-checked · PubMed (NCBI) 2026What this evidence cannot show
A counted absence is only as good as its symbol set, and short or word-like aliases inflate counts rather than shrink them, so every hit was title-checked and the checked number is the one reported. Title/abstract search misses work buried in supplementary tables and in screens that name a pathway rather than a gene.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The pathway is not unstudied even where the gene is: a Hoxa-dependency transcriptome in MLL-rearranged mouse leukaemia returns an FA-pathway-enriched signature, which no gene-symbol query would find. Kettyle LM et al. 2019
- E6weak confidence 2 of 5: Preliminary, small, indirect, or not yet peer reviewed.paper
FANCG in leukaemia more broadly: 33 PubMed records for the symbol and its aliases against leukaemia or leukaemia. A Hoxa cluster-dependency model of MLL-rearranged leukaemia produced a differential gene signature enriched for the Fanconi anaemia pathway.
Pathways, Processes, and Candidate Drugs Associated with a Hoxa Cluster-Dependency Model of Leukemia. · Kettyle LM, Lebert-Ghali CÉ, et al. · Cancers (Basel) 2019What this evidence cannot show
Expression, not dependency; mouse, not human.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The pathway is named but no individual FA gene including FANCG is singled out, so this cannot corroborate a gene-level claim. FANCG is also the one headline gene whose pan-cancer Chronos is near zero (-0.09), which makes its selectivity look real but its absolute requirement look small. Kettyle LM et al. 2019
- E7moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper
Human Fanconi anaemia patients, who are biallelically null for an FA gene, do develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia — a documented case of therapy-related AML carrying MLL-CBP t(11;16) arising in a child with Fanconi anaemia after topoisomerase-II-directed chemotherapy for ALL.
MLL-CBP fusion transcript in a therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with the t(11;16)(q23;p13) which developed in an acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient with Fanconi anemia. · Sugita K, Taki T, et al. · Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000What this evidence cannot show
A single 2000 case report, and the FA complementation group is not stated in the abstract, so which FA gene was lost is not established from this record. Therapy-related leukaemia in an FA background is also a special case.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- This is the sharpest argument against reading the DepMap signal as an absolute requirement: a KMT2A-rearranged clone arose and expanded in a host with a disabled FA pathway. It does not exclude a quantitative dependency, and the DepMap effect sizes are quantitative, not absolute. Quentin S et al. 2011
- E_q77_loc1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database
FANCG's subcellular record in UniProt O15287 (fetched 2026-09-21) annotates 'Nucleus' and 'Cytoplasm', BOTH at ECO:0000269 and BOTH citing the same single reference (PubMed:18550849), with the partition statement - 'The major form is nuclear. The minor form is cytoplasmic' - carried in an UNCODED note.
UniProtKB O15287 (FANCG_HUMAN) - SUBCELLULAR LOCATION comment block with evidence codes · UniProt Consortium 2026What this evidence cannot show
A measurement of the database, read from the comment array with evidence codes attached on 2026-09-21. The same structure as CCND3 in this tranche: two compartments, one supporting reference, and the quantitative statement in the uncoded half. Recorded because it means an experimental-evidence filter on this record returns two compartments and loses the only statement about their relative sizes.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The compartment is not in doubt - FANCG is unambiguously part of a nuclear complex and the 1999 and 2000 papers show it. The defect is that the record points at a 2008 interaction study rather than at those, so a reader tracing the provenance lands in the wrong decade and the wrong question. Garcia-Higuera I et al. 1999
- E_q77_loc2moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper
The sole experimental citation UniProt gives for BOTH of FANCG's compartments is not a localisation study: Tremblay et al. 2008 identify HES1 as a novel interactor of the Fanconi anaemia core complex.
HES1 is a novel interactor of the Fanconi anemia core complex. · Tremblay CS, Huang FF, Habi O, Huard CC, Godin C, Lévesque G, Carreau M · Blood 2008What this evidence cannot show
Rule 91 FIRES. The paper is on the right complex and in a haematology journal, and it very likely contains a fractionation or imaging panel - which is what an ECO:0000269 code records. It is not the founding observation and it is not about FANCG's compartment. Human cells; the FA core complex, not FANCG in isolation.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The replacement citation is unambiguous and older, which is the usual pattern: the 1999 paper's title is 'Fanconi anemia proteins FANCA, FANCC, and FANCG/XRCC9 interact in a functional NUCLEAR COMPLEX' and it shows FANCG is required for FANCA and FANCC to bind at all. Citing the 2008 paper is not wrong; it is just not the evidence a reader wants. Garcia-Higuera I et al. 1999
- E_q77_loc3established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper
FANCG'S SPATIAL ROLE IS TO MOVE ANOTHER SUBUNIT, AND THAT IS THE FOUNDING OBSERVATION THE DATABASE OMITS. FANCG is a component of a functional nuclear protein complex containing FANCA and FANCC and is required for their binding [E_q77_loc3a]; FANCG binds directly to the amino-terminal NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE of FANCA, and correcting an FA-G cell line with FANCG cDNA restores FANCA/FANCG binding, PROLONGS FANCA's cellular half-life and INCREASES THE NUCLEAR ACCUMULATION of the FA protein complex, with reciprocal effects on FANCG's half-life when an FA-A line is corrected.
The fanconi anemia proteins FANCA and FANCG stabilize each other and promote the nuclear accumulation of the Fanconi anemia complex. · Garcia-Higuera I, Kuang Y, Denham J, D'Andrea AD · Blood 2000What this evidence cannot show
Human FA patient-derived and complemented cell lines from 1999-2000. NO DOI is recorded for this reference because PubMed's article-id list for PMID 11050007 contains none - the field is omitted rather than constructed, per this project's citation rules. The companion 1999 paper is cited separately at [E_q77_loc3a]. Neither paper involves a fusion or a leukaemic cell, and both predate the modern FA core complex architecture.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- A protein that controls another protein's nuclear accumulation is not thereby characterised in its own compartment, and these papers do not report where the FANCG pool sits when the complex is not assembled. The cytoplasmic minor form UniProt describes is unexplained by them. So the founding papers replace the database's citation for the nuclear call and still leave the partition unmeasured. UniProt Consortium 2026
- E_q77_loc3aestablished confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper
FANCG/XRCC9 is required for the binding of FANCA and FANCC and is a component of a functional NUCLEAR protein complex containing both; the amino-terminal region of FANCA is required for FANCG binding, FANCC binding, nuclear localisation and functional activity of the complex.
Fanconi anemia proteins FANCA, FANCC, and FANCG/XRCC9 interact in a functional nuclear complex. · Garcia-Higuera I, Kuang Y, Näf D, Wasik J, D'Andrea AD · Mol Cell Biol 1999What this evidence cannot show
Human cells, 1999. This is the paper whose title states the annotated fact and which UniProt does not cite for it. Complementation-group-based genetics with co-immunoprecipitation; no haematopoietic primary material and no fusion.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The FA core complex is now known to contain many more subunits than the three named here - including FAAP100, the sibling entry in this tranche - so the 1999 architecture is superseded. What survives, and is what this item is cited for, is the NUCLEAR character of the complex and FANCG's requirement for its assembly. Tremblay CS et al. 2008
- E_q77_ct1strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
IN HUMAN FANCONI ANAEMIA PATIENTS, THE HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM AND PROGENITOR COMPARTMENT IS PROFOUNDLY DEFECTIVE BEFORE CLINICAL MARROW FAILURE BEGINS, and the mechanism is an exacerbated physiological damage response rather than a repair catastrophe: in response to replicative stress and unresolved DNA damage, p53 is HYPERACTIVATED in FA cells and triggers a LATE p21-dependent G0/G1 cell-cycle arrest, and KNOCKDOWN OF p53 RESCUES the HSPC defect in several in vitro and in vivo models including human FA and FA-like cells.
Bone marrow failure in Fanconi anemia is triggered by an exacerbated p53/p21 DNA damage response that impairs hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. · Ceccaldi R, Parmar K, Mouly E, Delord M, Kim JM, Regairaz M, Pla M, Vasquez N, Zhang QS, Pondarre C, Peffault de Latour R, Gluckman E, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Leblanc T, Larghero J, Grompe M, Socié G, D'Andrea AD, Soulier J · Cell Stem Cell 2012What this evidence cannot show
HUMAN primary FA patient material plus models - one of the few human cell-type results in this tranche - but it is a PATHWAY result across complementation groups and nothing in it isolates FANCG or FAAP100. No fusion and no leukaemia. Brief rule 64 applies in the unusual direction: the complex-level result cannot be attributed to a subunit, and this entry says so rather than claiming a FANCG-specific requirement.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- If FA pathway loss arrests HSPCs through p53/p21, then the DepMap depletion that put this gene in the graph may be scoring an ARREST rather than a dependency - CRISPR proliferation screens cannot tell them apart. That reading predicts the effect should depend on TP53 status of the lines, which is checkable in existing data and has not been checked. It also sits badly with this entry's own [E7]: FA patients with no pathway at all still develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia. UniProt Consortium 2026
FA core complex TPR subunit; rank 27 by raw effect, d -0.264; FA/BRCA set p = 5e-05 on 20,000 gene-set permutations
depleted in both lineage halves; line-label permutation p = 0.0008, correlations preserved
pan-essentiality check: not a common essential
KMT2A-rearranged AML lines vs non-KMT2A AML lines, lineage held constant: headline-eight mean d -0.334, p = 0.0001
- depends on →KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL vs non-KMT2A B-ALL, lineage held constant: headline-eight mean d -0.308, p = 5e-05
- related to →KMT2A / MLL1 — the gene that breaks
no published record links this gene to KMT2A or MLL: a counted, alias-searched, title-checked absence
one of the eight genes the hypothesis is built on
- ← related toPan-essentiality: checked for all eight, and cleared — but a shallow dependency is its own problem
FANCG has the best selectivity ratio (pan-cancer Chronos -0.091) and the least robust evidence — it is the only one of the eight stronger in the myeloid half
- expressed in →Bone marrow haematopoietic stem cell — the postnatal comparator, and why the same fusion behaves differently here
FA pathway loss depletes human HSPCs before clinical marrow failure, through hyperactivated p53 and a late p21-dependent G0/G1 arrest that p53 knockdown rescues
FANCG is a core-complex subunit of the pathway that defines this state; its own subnuclear behaviour has never been measured, the pathway's focal currency being FANCD2/FANCI
the FA HSPC defect is a p21-dependent G0/G1 ARREST, which a CRISPR proliferation screen scores identically to a dependency
FANCG's documented spatial role is to move another subunit: it binds FANCA's N-terminal NLS and drives nuclear accumulation of the FA core complex