ACIN1 (Acinus) - a splicing/apoptosis protein whose only domain is the 35-residue module the leukaemic fusion keeps, and whose entire localization record is uncoded
also called ACIN1 · Acinus · ACINUS · KIAA0670 · fSAP152 · Apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer in the nucleus
ACIN1 normally works on messenger RNA splicing and helps condense the DNA of a dying cell. A leukaemia-causing accident keeps only its small DNA-gripping tip and throws away everything else it does - so the leukaemia is not caused by ACIN1 doing its job in the wrong place, but by that tip being used as a postal address for a different protein.
The same thing, for a scientist
ACIN1 (Q9UKV3, 1341 aa, 14q11.2) is the RNA-binding subunit of the **ASAP complex** (with SAP18 and RNPS1), an auxiliary component of the **exon junction complex**, the caspase-3-activated inducer of **apoptotic chromatin condensation**, and a modulator of *BCL2L1*/Bcl-X splicing that suppresses the pro-apoptotic Bcl-X(S) isoform [E1][E2][E3]. Live UniProt annotates exactly **one domain - SAP at aa 72-106 (Pfam PF02037)** - six predicted disordered regions, and a C-terminal region at 1210-1237 sufficient for RNPS1/SAP18 binding [E1]. This entry exists in this graph for one reason: **ACIN1 is the modal 5' partner of NUTM1 in infant B-ALL (44% of infant cases with a known partner), and the fusion retains only the SAP domain** [E4]. Everything ACIN1 is documented to do lies C-terminal of it and is lost. Two further things make this entry worth reading rather than just linking. **First, it has a leukaemia connection of its own**: SRPK2 phosphorylates Acinus, **redistributing it from nuclear speckles to the nucleoplasm** and upregulating **cyclin A1 but not A2**; knockdown of either abolishes cyclin A1 in leukaemia cells and arrests them in G1, and both are overexpressed in some AML patients with correlated cyclin A1 [E3]. **Second, its localization record is entirely uncoded**: Nucleus, Nucleus speckle and nucleoplasm, plus the SRPK2 note, carry **no evidence code at all**, while FUNCTION carries five `ECO:0000269` citations - and the phosphosite is numbered **Ser-1180** by UniProt and **S422** by the paper, two isoform frames for what is presumably one residue [E1][E3].
This is a prediction, not a measurement. No one has seen this protein in this shape. The colours say how much the software trusts itself, and that is worth reading before anything else — the orange stretches are places the model is effectively saying this part has no fixed shape.
I have never read one of these pictures before
A protein is one long chain of amino acids that folds up. The ribbon traces that chain from one end to the other; it is not a wire, it is a simplification of where the backbone runs. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Domains are the stretches of chain that do a particular job, and they are what the coloured blocks above the picture mark out. Click one and the view flies to it. In this project the important question about any domain is usually whether the fusion still has it — the labels say lost where it does not.
Anything in yellow sticks is a bound small molecule, which is usually the drug.
Why the fusion is not an ACIN1 gain of function
ACIN1::NUTM1 joins exon 3 or 4 of ACIN1 to exon 3 of NUTM1, retaining the SAP domain and most of NUTM1 4. SAP sits at aa 72-106 1. Every documented ACIN1 activity is mapped, or maps by complex membership, to sequence C-terminal of residue 1000:
| activity | where it lives | in the fusion? |
|---|---|---|
| ASAP complex (SAP18 + RNPS1) | region 1210-1237 sufficient for it 1 | lost |
| exon junction complex association | via ASAP 15 | lost |
| caspase-3-activated apoptotic chromatin condensation | cleavage-dependent, full-length protein 2 | lost |
| BCL2L1/Bcl-X splicing modulation | splicing activity of the complex 15 | lost |
| SRPK2 phosphosite (Ser-1180 / S422) and cyclin A1 control | C-terminal SR region 13 | lost |
| SAP DNA-binding domain | aa 72-106 1 | retained 4 |
So the fusion is a module transplant, not a deregulated ACIN1. The right reading of fusion-acin1-nutm1 is that a small scaffold-attachment/DNA-binding domain has been given a disordered p300 activator to carry, and the right question about it is where that domain binds DNA - not what ACIN1 normally does.
Localization, subnuclear localization, and a record that is uncoded end to end
Live UniProt Q9UKV3, fetched 2026-09-22 1:
- Nucleus (SL-0191) - no evidence code
- Nucleus speckle (SL-0186) - no evidence code
- Nucleus, nucleoplasm (SL-0190) - no evidence code
- note: "Phosphorylation on Ser-1180 by SRPK2 redistributes it from the nuclear speckles to the nucleoplasm" - no evidence code
Meanwhile the same record's FUNCTION field carries five ECO:0000269 citations. So this is not a sparse entry; it is an entry whose localization happens to be uncoded while its function is well coded. Rule 91's second clause is the right handling: read the uncoded comments, record them as uncoded, and do not discard them - because the speckle-to-nucleoplasm switch is the most mechanistically interesting statement in the record and an ECO:0000269 filter would delete it.
The primary experiment does exist and this entry names it rather than leaving the annotation as an orphan pointer: the Cancer Res 2008 study shows SRPK2 binding and phosphorylating acinus and "redistribut[ing] it from the nuclear speckles to the nucleoplasm", with phosphomimetic and unphosphorylatable mutants behaving as predicted 3. UniProt does not code the localization comment to it.
And the residue numbers do not match. UniProt says Ser-1180; the paper mutates S422D and S422A. Two isoform frames for what is presumably the same residue - ACIN1 has short and long isoforms and the 2008 work used a shorter one. This entry records both numbers and does not assert the alignment, which it has not verified. Anyone comparing the database and the paper would otherwise conclude they describe two different phosphosites.
Cell type. Ubiquitous expression; the uncoded TISSUE SPECIFICITY note adds that the Ser-1180-phosphorylated form is "highly expressed and phosphorylated in patients with myeloid hematologic malignancies" - again uncoded, and again the single most disease-relevant line in the record 1.
Epigenetics: an explicit NOT-APPLICABLE, on fetched architecture
See data.epigenetic_readout. In short: ACIN1 writes, erases and reads no histone or DNA modification. Its Pfam complement is exactly three families - PF02037 (SAP), PF16294 (RSB_motif), PF28976 (RRM_ACIN1) - and its only annotated domain is the SAP module 1. None of those is a catalytic or reader module for a chromatin mark.
What is not not-applicable is chromatin in the ordinary structural sense: this protein's name is apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer and it does condense chromatin after caspase-3 cleavage 2. Condensing chromatin is not modifying or reading a mark, and conflating the two would be the same category error this graph has recorded elsewhere for proteins with chromatin in their names. The distinction is worth keeping crisp precisely because the name invites the error.
| uniprot | Q9UKV3 |
|---|---|
| gene symbol | ACIN1 |
| protein name | Apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer in the nucleus |
| length AA | 1341 |
| alphafold ID | AF-Q9UKV3-F1 |
| hgnc | HGNC:17066 |
| cytoband | 14q11.2 |
| accession resolution | UniProt REST query gene_exact:ACIN1 AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true, run 2026-09-22; exactly one reviewed hit; primary gene name read back as ACIN1 with synonyms ACINUS and KIAA0670, uniProtkbId ACINU_HUMAN, length 1341 from the same record. HGNC:17066 and 14q11.2 from rest.genenames.org the same day. |
| domains note | One domain in 1,341 residues. The other annotated features are six ECO:0000256 disordered regions and a Region at 1210-1237 described as 'Sufficient for interaction with RNPS1 and SAP18 and formation of the ASAP complex'; that region is not given a domain lane because it is a functional sufficiency window rather than a structural module. Pfam complement: PF02037 (SAP), PF16294 (RSB_motif), PF28976 (RRM_ACIN1). |
| complex | ASAP (Acinus + SAP18 + RNPS1); auxiliary component of the exon junction complex (EJC) |
| cell type | ubiquitous expression (UniProt, uncoded). The disease-relevant observations are haematopoietic in two independent directions: the Ser-1180-phosphorylated form is reported highly expressed and phosphorylated in patients with MYELOID haematologic malignancies (UniProt, uncoded), with SRPK2 and acinus overexpressed in some AML patients and correlated with cyclin A1 (PMID 18559500); while the fusion disease is B-LYMPHOID infant ALL (PMID 31515871). |
| cell state | cell-cycle-coupled: SRPK2 is a cell-cycle-regulated kinase, and acinus or SRPK2 ablation abolishes cyclin A1 and arrests leukaemia cells in G1 (PMID 18559500). Separately, the protein is a caspase-3 substrate whose cleavage is required for apoptotic chromatin condensation (PMID 10490026), so its functional state is set by both cell-cycle phosphorylation and apoptotic proteolysis. |
| epigenetic readout | NOT APPLICABLE AS AN ACTIVITY, ON FETCHED ARCHITECTURE - AND THE NAME IS THE TRAP. ACIN1 writes, erases and reads no histone or DNA modification. Live UniProt Q9UKV3 (2026-09-22) is 1341 aa with exactly ONE annotated domain, SAP at aa 72-106, six ECO:0000256 disordered regions, and one functional sufficiency region at 1210-1237; the complete Pfam complement is PF02037 (SAP), PF16294 (RSB_motif) and PF28976 (RRM_ACIN1). There is no SET, JmjC, HAT, HDAC, sirtuin, bromo, chromo, Tudor, PHD, CXXC, YEATS, MBD, DNMT or TET module anywhere in the protein, and no histone or DNA substrate is named in its FUNCTION field, which is about RNA processing and apoptosis. WHAT IT DOES TO CHROMATIN IS STRUCTURAL, NOT CHEMICAL: the protein is named for inducing apoptotic chromatin CONDENSATION after caspase-3 cleavage (PMID 10490026), and condensing chromatin is not modifying or reading a mark. Keeping those separate matters here precisely because the protein's name contains the word chromatin and would otherwise be scored as an epigenetic regulator by any name-based instrument. WHAT IS NOT NOT-APPLICABLE: the SAP module is a scaffold-attachment-factor-family DNA-binding domain, so this protein DOES contact DNA, and in ACIN1::NUTM1 that module is the part retained and is the presumed chromatin address of the oncoprotein (PMID 31515871) - which makes ACIN1 epigenetically relevant as an ADDRESS and not as an activity. Its nuclear-speckle residence is also a subnuclear, splicing-compartment fact rather than a chromatin-mark fact, and it is uncoded. REOPENING CONDITIONS: (a) any annotation or report of a catalytic or reader module for a histone or DNA modification in ACIN1; (b) any demonstration that the SAP domain binds a MODIFIED DNA base or a modified histone rather than DNA as such; (c) any occupancy experiment on ACIN1 or ACIN1::NUTM1 showing mark-dependent recruitment, which would make the address itself mark-driven. |
| epigenetic role | none as a writer, eraser or reader; contributes a DNA-binding SAP module that serves as the chromatin ADDRESS of the ACIN1::NUTM1 oncoprotein |
| classification | fusion partner (5' side) of NUTM1 in infant B-ALL - the modal infant partner at 44% - written here so that fusion-acin1-nutm1 resolves and so that the partner's real baseline compartment and real activities are on the record rather than assumed. NOT a KMT2A interactor and not reported in contact with menin. |
| menin relationship | NONE REPORTED. No MBM-like motif; no menin contact in UniProt's record or in any paper read for this entry. |
| subnuclear localization | NUCLEAR SPECKLES and NUCLEOPLASM, as a REGULATED distribution rather than a fixed address: SRPK2 phosphorylation moves the protein from speckles to nucleoplasm, and the phosphorylated form drives cyclin A1 transcription. CODING STATUS: all three locations AND the SRPK2 note are UNCODED in UniProt (no ECO of any kind), fetched 2026-09-22, while the same entry's FUNCTION field carries five ECO:0000269 citations. The founding experiment for the switch is PMID 18559500 (Cancer Res 2008) and UniProt does not code the comment to it. |
| localization shown for fusion | nothing has been imaged for ACIN1::NUTM1 in any cell |
previous symbols
[ "ACINUS" ]
domains
[
{
"name": "SAP (SAF-A/B, Acinus and PIAS)",
"start": 72,
"end": 106,
"pfam": "PF02037",
"source": "UniProt Q9UKV3, fetched live 2026-09-22 - the protein's ONLY annotated domain, and the only part of ACIN1 retained in ACIN1::NUTM1"
}
]pfam
[ "PF02037", "PF16294", "PF28976" ]
localization
{
"subcellular": "nucleus. UniProt Q9UKV3 lists Nucleus (SL-0191), Nucleus speckle (SL-0186) and Nucleus nucleoplasm (SL-0190).",
"subnuclear": "NUCLEAR SPECKLES and NUCLEOPLASM, as a REGULATED distribution rather than a fixed address: SRPK2 phosphorylation moves the protein from speckles to nucleoplasm, and the phosphorylated form drives cyclin A1 transcription. CODING STATUS: all three locations AND the SRPK2 note are UNCODED in UniProt (no ECO of any kind), fetched 2026-09-22, while the same entry's FUNCTION field carries five ECO:0000269 citations. The founding experiment for the switch is PMID 18559500 (Cancer Res 2008) and UniProt does not code the comment to it.",
"uncoded": true,
"phosphosite_frame_discrepancy": "UniProt's note says Ser-1180; PMID 18559500 mutates S422D and S422A. Two isoform numbering frames, presumably one residue. THIS ENTRY HAS NOT VERIFIED THE ALIGNMENT and asserts neither number as canonical for the other's frame.",
"shown_for_fusion": "NOT shown for ACIN1::NUTM1, and CANNOT be inherited from this entry: the fusion retains only aa 1-~106, so neither the speckle-determining sequence nor Ser-1180 is present. See fusion-acin1-nutm1.",
"localization_shown_for_fusion": "nothing has been imaged for ACIN1::NUTM1 in any cell"
}epigenetic marks
[]
uniprot defects flagged not edited
[
"All three SUBCELLULAR LOCATION values and the SRPK2/Ser-1180 note are UNCODED, although a primary experiment exists (PMID 18559500) and the same entry codes FUNCTION five times. The annotation is a correct statement with no pointer to its evidence.",
"The note numbers the phosphosite Ser-1180 while the cited mechanism's primary paper mutates S422 - two isoform frames with no reconciliation printed in either place, which is the same class of hazard check-isoform-frames.py was built for.",
"TISSUE SPECIFICITY carries the only line in the record connecting this protein to haematologic malignancy ('highly expressed and phosphorylated in patients with myeloid hematologic malignancies') and it, too, is uncoded."
]- Targeting ACIN1 to treat an ACIN1::NUTM1 leukaemia would be aimed at the wrong molecule: the fusion keeps 106 of 1,341 residues, so an inhibitor of ACIN1's splicing or apoptotic functions would act only on the wild-type allele - in a cell that still needs it - and leave the oncoprotein untouched.
- SRPK2 is the one druggable node adjacent to this protein, and its published effect is to INCREASE leukaemia proliferation through cyclin A1, which makes SRPK2 inhibition superficially attractive. But that axis requires Ser-1180, which the fusion does not have, so the rationale applies to wild-type acinus in myeloid disease and not to the B-ALL fusion.
- ACIN1 suppresses the pro-apoptotic Bcl-X(S) isoform. Any agent that restores or enhances ACIN1 function in a NUTM1-fusion blast would be expected to make it LESS apoptosis-prone, i.e. to work against the chemosensitivity that currently cures these children.
- This protein's name will keep causing category errors. Any name-based or text-mined instrument scanning for epigenetic regulators will score 'apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer' as a chromatin modifier; it is not one, and the entry says so explicitly with the fetched domain architecture behind it.
- What does the SAP domain actually bind? SAP is a scaffold-attachment-factor-family module, which predicts AT-rich or matrix-associated DNA rather than promoter-selective binding. If that is right, the ACIN1::NUTM1 oncoprotein's address is a very different kind of address from KMT2A's CpG-selective CXXC, and its HOXA9 activation would need a different explanation than direct promoter binding.
- Do the Ser-1180 and S422 numberings refer to one residue? An alignment of the UniProt canonical against the isoform used in PMID 18559500 would settle it in minutes and would close a discrepancy that currently reads as two separate phosphosites in two separate places.
- Is the remaining wild-type ACIN1 allele haploinsufficient in an ACIN1::NUTM1 blast? ACIN1's normal job includes suppressing formation of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-X(S) isoform. If one allele is not enough, the leukaemic cell would sit closer to the apoptotic threshold - which is a concrete candidate explanation for this subtype's chemosensitivity and is testable by Bcl-X isoform ratios in KOPN32 against an ACIN1-wild-type B-ALL line.
- Is the SRPK2-acinus-cyclin A1 axis active in B-lineage as well as myeloid leukaemia? The published axis is AML and the NUTM1 fusion disease is B-ALL, so the two ACIN1-leukaemia connections currently sit in different lineages and nobody has asked whether they meet.
- E1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database
UniProtKB Q9UKV3 (ACINU_HUMAN) is 1341 aa with exactly one annotated domain, SAP at aa 72-106 (Pfam PF02037), six predicted disordered regions, and a region at 1210-1237 sufficient for RNPS1/SAP18 binding and ASAP-complex formation; its Pfam complement is PF02037 (SAP), PF16294 (RSB_motif) and PF28976 (RRM_ACIN1); FUNCTION carries five ECO:0000269 citations and describes exon junction complex and ASAP complex membership, RNA binding, inhibition of pro-apoptotic Bcl-X(S) formation, caspase-3-activated apoptotic chromatin condensation and regulation of cyclin A1 but not A2 in leukaemia cells; and all four localization statements - Nucleus, Nucleus speckle, Nucleus nucleoplasm, and the note that Ser-1180 phosphorylation by SRPK2 moves it from speckles to nucleoplasm - carry NO evidence code, as does the TISSUE SPECIFICITY statement that the Ser-1180-phosphorylated form is highly expressed and phosphorylated in patients with myeloid haematologic malignancies.
UniProtKB Q9UKV3 (ACINU_HUMAN) - Apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer in the nucleus, Homo sapiens · UniProtKB 2026What this evidence cannot show
Fetched live 2026-09-22 by gene_exact:ACIN1 AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true (one reviewed hit; accession and length read back from the returned record), then re-fetched by accession for the 35-item reference list. HGNC:17066 and location 14q11.2 fetched separately from rest.genenames.org, which also gives ACINUS as the previous symbol and KIAA0670 and fSAP152 as aliases. The absence of evidence codes on the localization comments is a property of the record as served on that date; it does NOT mean no experiment exists - the experiment does exist and is [E3] - only that the annotation is not coded to it. The disordered regions are ECO:0000256 predictions.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The uncoded lines are where the most useful statements sit in this record - the speckle-to-nucleoplasm switch and the myeloid-malignancy observation are both uncoded, while the well-coded FUNCTION field says nothing about either. An ECO:0000269 filter applied to this entry would keep the least surprising content and discard the rest. Jang SW et al. 2008
- E2established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper
Acinus is a nuclear factor that induces apoptotic chromatin condensation after cleavage by caspase-3, without inducing DNA fragmentation; immunodepletion showed it to be essential for apoptotic chromatin condensation in vitro and an antisense study showed it to be important for the same process in cells.
Acinus is a caspase-3-activated protein required for apoptotic chromatin condensation · Sahara S, Aoto M, Eguchi Y, et al. · Nature 1999What this evidence cannot show
A 1999 in-vitro reconstitution plus antisense knockdown, i.e. pre-RNAi methodology, and the naming paper for the protein. This activity requires caspase-3 cleavage of the full-length protein and is therefore NOT available to the ACIN1::NUTM1 fusion, which retains only aa 1-~106 of ACIN1 [E4]. It is cited here to establish what the protein is named for and to keep 'condenses chromatin' separate from 'modifies or reads a chromatin mark'.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- Acinus-mediated DNA fragmentation is itself regulated by an antiapoptotic partner, AAC-11, so the apoptotic activity is not a simple switch and the protein's net effect on cell death depends on its complex context - which is also why the ASAP complex disassembles after apoptosis is induced. EMBO Journal 2009
- E3strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
SRPK2 binds and phosphorylates acinus and redistributes it from the nuclear speckles to the nucleoplasm, upregulating cyclin A1 but not cyclin A2; the phosphomimetic acinus S422D enhances cyclin A1 transcription while the unphosphorylatable S422A blocks SRPK2's stimulatory effect; ablation of acinus or SRPK2 abolishes cyclin A1 expression in leukaemia cells and arrests them in G1, overexpression of either increases leukaemia cell proliferation, and both are overexpressed in some human acute myelogenous leukaemia patients with correlated cyclin A1 levels.
Serine/arginine protein-specific kinase 2 promotes leukemia cell proliferation by phosphorylating acinus and regulating cyclin A1 · Jang SW, Yang SJ, Ehlen A, et al. · Cancer Research 2008What this evidence cannot show
THE RESIDUE NUMBER DOES NOT MATCH THE DATABASE. This paper mutates S422; UniProt's note for the same mechanism says Ser-1180. ACIN1 has short and long isoforms and the two numbers are presumably one residue in two frames, but THIS ENTRY HAS NOT VERIFIED THE ALIGNMENT and does not assert it. Cell lines plus patient-sample correlation; the AML association is correlative and the disease is MYELOID, whereas the NUTM1 fusion disease is B-lymphoid, so this is a separate ACIN1-leukaemia link and not background for the fusion. The phosphosite is C-terminal and is NOT retained in ACIN1::NUTM1.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- This mechanism is unavailable to the fusion oncoprotein: the retained ACIN1 fragment ends around residue 106, roughly 1,074 residues N-terminal of Ser-1180, so neither the speckle residence nor its phospho-regulation can be inherited by ACIN1::NUTM1 - which is exactly why the fusion's subnuclear address must be measured rather than inferred from this protein. Pincez T et al. 2020
- E4strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
ACIN1 is the commonest NUTM1 fusion partner in infant B-ALL (17 of 39 infant cases with a known partner, 44%), and the fusion joins ACIN1 exon 3 or exon 4 to NUTM1 exon 3, retaining the functional DNA-binding SAP domain of ACIN1 and most of NUTM1; the rearrangement is cryptic and undetectable by standard cytogenetics.
Cryptic recurrent ACIN1-NUTM1 fusions in non-KMT2A-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia · Pincez T, Landry JR, Roussy M, et al. · Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 2020What this evidence cannot show
The breakpoint and SAP-retention statements are from this two-patient founding report; the 44% frequency is from the separate 85-case Ponte di Legno/Interfant series (PMID 34211097, read in full from PMC8478641) and is combined here into one claim, which is why both sources are named. Neither source gives residue boundaries for the retained ACIN1 fragment - the aa 72-106 SAP coordinates come from live UniProt [E1] and the inference that everything C-terminal is lost follows from the domain's N-terminal position.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- A 175-infant single-centre series instead reports BRD9::NUTM1 as the commonest NUTM1 fusion in its KMT2A-wild-type group. That group is n=9, so this is very probably sampling, but the published record disagrees with itself and both figures should be carried. Ilyasova K et al. 2025
- E5strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
The ASAP complex is composed of SAP18, RNPS1 and Acinus isoforms, inhibits RNA processing in vitro, accelerates cell death when microinjected into mammalian cells, and disassembles after apoptosis is induced, linking RNA processing to apoptosis.
ASAP, a novel protein complex involved in RNA processing and apoptosis · Schwerk C, Prasad J, Degenhardt K, et al. · Molecular and Cellular Biology 2003What this evidence cannot show
HeLa extracts and in-vitro splicing reactions plus microinjection; no haematopoietic system. Complex membership is mediated by ACIN1 sequence C-terminal of residue 1200 and is therefore not available to the ACIN1::NUTM1 fusion.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- A later structural study of the ASAP core reports a related Pinin-containing PSAP complex, so the SAP18/RNPS1 scaffold is shared with a paralogous complex that does not contain Acinus - meaning ASAP-attributed activities are not uniquely ACIN1's. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2012
5' partner, exon 3 or exon 4 - retains ONLY the SAP DNA-binding domain (aa 72-106, PF02037) and loses every documented ACIN1 activity, all of which maps C-terminal of residue 1000
ACIN1::NUTM1 - the modal NUTM1 partner in infant B-ALL (44%)