Oncofusion

start / graph / cell-state-cd24-positive-preleukaemic-kmt2a-aff1

Cell statemoderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.Q60-cellstate2

The CD24-positive pre-leukaemic state — what the index fusion makes before it makes leukaemia

also called CD24+ pre-leukaemic state · KMT2A::AFF1 pre-leukaemia

When the KMT2A::AFF1 fusion is switched on at the right stage of development, the cells do not become leukaemia straight away: they first enter a distinct in-between state carrying a surface marker called CD24. That in-between state is a target nobody is aiming at.

The same thing, for a scientist

Ontogeny-specific induction of KMT2A::AFF1 drives development of a distinct CD24-positive pre-leukaemic state [E1]. This is one of very few cell-state characterisations in this beat's worklist that is (a) about the INDEX fusion rather than a murine MLL-AF9 or MLL-ENL proxy and (b) defined by a surface marker, which makes it sortable and therefore experimentally tractable. It sits between `cell-state-fetal-program-retention` and overt leukaemia, and it is the state that `cell-state-neonatal-window-of-transformability` predicts should exist.

Go deeper
Why a surface marker matters more than a signature here

Most cell states in this graph are defined by a transcriptional signature, which means they can only be scored after the fact, in dissociated cells, by sequencing. CD24 is a surface antigen: the state can be sorted alive, transplanted, drugged and re-sorted. Of the twenty-two cell-state-* entries in this graph, few carry that property.

The practical consequence is that this is the pre-leukaemic state most amenable to a limiting-dilution transplant asking whether it is the reservoir the disease re-grows from.

What is not known

Whether the CD24-positive state is necessary — whether every KMT2A::AFF1 leukaemia passes through it — is untested, and the paper establishing it does not claim so. Nor is it known whether the state persists in the patient at diagnosis, or whether it is a transient developmental intermediate that is gone by the time disease is detectable. Both are answerable with existing material.

Facts and figures
state definitionA CD24-positive intermediate arising when KMT2A::AFF1 is induced at a permissive ontogenetic stage, preceding overt leukaemia
sortable alivetrue
locationfetal/neonatal haematopoietic compartment
fusionfusion-kmt2a-aff1
markers
[
  "CD24"
]
atlas refs
[
  {
    "label": "ontogeny-specific KMT2A::AFF1 induction",
    "pmid": "40646135",
    "title": "Ontogeny-specific induction of the KMT2A::AFF1-fusion drives development of a distinct CD24 positive pre-leukemic state.",
    "authors": "Calderón AS, Ghazanfari R, Masoumi Z, et al.",
    "venue": "Leukemia",
    "year": 2025,
    "title_provenance": "Title/authors/venue backfilled from PubMed esummary on 2026-09-20 because this citation stored a bare PMID with no title, which made it unscoreable by verify-citations.py. BACKFILLING IS NOT VERIFICATION: it confirms the PMID resolves to a real paper, not that this is the right paper for the claim. That still requires reading."
  }
]
relation to existing entries
{
  "cell-state-fetal-program-retention": "the background programme this state arises on",
  "cell-state-neonatal-window-of-transformability": "the window during which induction produces this state"
}
How this could bite us back
  • A pre-leukaemic state is a target with no patients: by the time a child presents, the state may be gone, and a drug that removes it has no trial population.
  • CD24 is broadly expressed on normal B-lineage cells, so a CD24-directed intervention would not be selective for this state; the marker is useful for sorting, not for targeting.
  • If the state is transient and non-obligatory, removing it would not prevent the disease.
Still open
  1. Is the CD24-positive state obligatory, or one of several routes to KMT2A::AFF1 leukaemia?
  2. Does a CD24-positive fusion-positive population exist in human cord blood from newborns who later develop infant ALL? The Guthrie-card and cord-blood cohorts could answer this.
  3. Is the state menin-inhibitor sensitive? Nothing in the graph tests a pre-leukaemic state against any drug.
Every source behind this entry (1)
  1. E1moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper

    Ontogeny-specific induction of the KMT2A::AFF1 fusion drives the development of a distinct CD24-positive pre-leukaemic state.

    What this evidence cannot show

    2025 report in Leukemia; the abstract was read in this beat and the full text was not opened, so the surface-marker phenotype is taken from the abstract. The system is an ontogeny-controlled induction model rather than patient material, so whether the state exists in patients is untested.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • Human cord-blood CD34+ cells carrying the reciprocal AF4-MLL show transiently augmented multilineage engraftment but do NOT initiate leukaemia, so a fusion-positive pre-leukaemic expansion in human cells is not by itself sufficient for disease and a CD24-positive intermediate need not be on the causal path. Prieto C et al. 2017
Connected to