Oncofusion

start / graph / ana-unstated-system-dot1l-oglcnac-unresolved

Analysisestablished confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.Q18b-unstated-systems

Bounded failure with a near-miss worth recording: a GEO series matching the topic exactly belongs to a different paper

also called PMID 34551297 bounded failure · GSE200059 attribution trap · DOT1L O-GlcNAcylation system

A paper on DOT1L being sugar-modified never names the MLL fusions it used, and it deposited nothing readable. A search of the data repository turned up exactly one dataset on precisely that topic - and it belongs to a different research group and a different paper. Attributing it would have produced a confident wrong answer.

The same thing, for a scientist

`mechanism-dot1l-oglcnacylation-stability` hedges PMID 34551297 with *"no in vivo or primary-sample data are described in the abstract, and the MLL fusions used are not named"* [E1]. The source did not resolve: no PMCID in PubMed esummary or the Europe PMC core record, `isOpenAccess: N`, `inEPMC: N`, zero GEO by elink, zero SRA/BioSample/BioProject [E2]. **The near-miss is the reason this entry exists.** A GEO keyword search on `DOT1L AND "O-GlcNAc"` returns **exactly one series, GSE200059**, titled *"Dot1L recruits OGT target chromatin to regulate histones O-GlcNAcylation"* - a title so close to the paper's subject that an agent working from topic match alone would attribute it without hesitation. It is a different study. Its `!Series_pubmed_id` is **35690146**, its seventeen contributors (Bo Xu, Can Zhang, Hui Sun and others) do not match, its submission date is April 2022 against the paper's 2021 publication, and its ten samples are **HEK293T CUT&Tag for OGT and Dot1L**, not leukaemia at all [E3]. Attributing GSE200059 to PMID 34551297 would have produced a resolution reading *the system is HEK293T* - clean, specific, and wrong about a paper whose subject is MLL-fusion leukaemia cell proliferation. **A single, exact, topic-matched hit is the most dangerous result a keyword search can return.**

Go deeper
The check that catches it, in one field

Every GEO series carries !Series_pubmed_id in its targ=self record when the submitters have linked a publication. Reading it takes one extra request and settles attribution outright:

GET acc.cgi?acc=GSE200059&targ=self&form=text&view=brief
  !Series_pubmed_id = 35690146        <- not 34551297
  !Series_contributor = Bo,,Xu        <- 17 contributors, none matching
  !Series_submission_date = Apr 03 2022
  !Series_overall_design = Cut&Tag dataset of OGT and Dot1L in HEK293T cells

This is the mirror image of the trap in ana-unstated-system-paf-complex-species-resolved, where the linked deposition turned out to be a different experiment from the same paper. Here the deposition is a different paper on the same topic. Both fail silently and both are caught by reading the series-level record rather than the sample-level one.

The general rule: a keyword-discovered series must be attributed by !Series_pubmed_id or contributor match, never by topic. A series found through elink is attributed by construction; a series found by search is not.

What remains unknown

The entry keeps its caveat unchanged: the MLL fusions behind the O-GlcNAcylation-stability result are unnamed, and no in vivo or primary-sample data are described. This beat adds only that the unknown is not resolvable from any public repository, and that the one dataset a searcher would find is a false lead.

One substantive note that does not require the paper: the mechanism as described - a post-translational modification stabilising DOT1L protein - is fusion-agnostic on its face. If it holds, it would hold for any DOT1L-dependent leukaemia, which makes the unnamed fusion roster less consequential here than in most of this beat's sources. That is a reason to rank this bounded failure low, not a reason to close it.

Facts and figures
scriptnone - Europe PMC, NCBI elink, GEO keyword search and series-level record
statusrun
result summaryUnresolved. No PMCID, no deposition. A single topic-exact GEO hit (GSE200059) was excluded by its Series_pubmed_id of 35690146, a non-overlapping seventeen-contributor list, an April 2022 submission date and HEK293T cell type. Attributing it would have produced a confident wrong resolution.
what would resolve itSubscription access to Cell Reports 2021, or a later PMC deposit.
resolution classbounded failure
inputs
[
  "PMID 34551297",
  "GSE200059"
]
routes tried
[
  "PubMed esummary (no pmc)",
  "Europe PMC core (pmcid null, isOpenAccess N, inEPMC N)",
  "elink pubmed->gds, sra, biosample, bioproject (0 each)",
  "esearch db=gds 'DOT1L AND O-GlcNAc' (1 hit, GSE200059, excluded by Series_pubmed_id)"
]
near miss
{
  "accession": "GSE200059",
  "series_pubmed_id": "35690146",
  "why_excluded": "different publication, different contributors, HEK293T not leukaemia, submitted after the paper published"
}
entries affected
[
  "mechanism-dot1l-oglcnacylation-stability"
]
How this could bite us back
  • An OGT- or O-GlcNAc-directed strategy would perturb a nutrient-sensing modification used by thousands of nuclear proteins, so a DOT1L-stability rationale is a very narrow justification for a very broad intervention.
  • If DOT1L stability is nutrient-responsive, then DOT1L inhibitor pharmacodynamics could vary with a patient's metabolic state, which is a confound no cell-line dose series would reveal.
  • The near-miss dataset in this entry would have supplied a clean, specific and wrong system; any future automated provenance sweep over this graph will hit it again unless the attribution rule is enforced.
Still open
  1. Which MLL fusions carry the DOT1L O-GlcNAcylation stability result? Unresolvable from any public repository.
  2. Is DOT1L protein stability regulated the same way in a KMT2A::AFF1 cell, where DOT1L is not recruited through an AHD? If the modification is fusion-agnostic this matters less, and nobody has tested it either way.
Every source behind this entry (3)
  1. E1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper

    The paper reports that DOT1L O-GlcNAcylation promotes its protein stability and MLL-fusion leukaemia cell proliferation, and its abstract does not name the MLL fusions used or describe in vivo or primary-sample data.

    DOT1L O-GlcNAcylation promotes its protein stability and MLL-fusion leukemia cell proliferation. · Song T, Zou Q, Yan Y, Lv S, Li N, Zhao X, Ma X, Liu H, Tang B, Sun L · Cell Rep 2021
    What this evidence cannot show

    Identifiers taken from the NCBI esummary record fetched on 2026-09-19. No claim is made about the paper's content beyond its abstract.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • A mechanism acting on DOT1L protein stability rather than on fusion binding would be expected to operate across DOT1L-dependent leukaemias regardless of partner, which lowers the cost of the unnamed roster here relative to the other unresolved sources in this beat. Godfrey L et al. 2021
  2. E2established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database

    No full text or deposition is reachable for this paper: PubMed esummary returns no PMC identifier, the Europe PMC core record returns pmcid null with isOpenAccess N and inEPMC N, and elink from the PMID to GEO, SRA, BioSample and BioProject returns zero records.

    Europe PMC REST core record and NCBI elink for PMID 34551297 · Europe PMC and NCBI Entrez Programming Utilities 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    Run on 2026-09-19 from a single network location without subscription access. With no PMCID present, the cycle-50 rule's second clause cannot be attempted, so this is a complete rather than an ambiguous unreadable. Cell Reports is a hybrid journal and this article may be readable at the publisher.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • Six of this beat's sixteen resolutions came from accessions printed in a data-availability statement, so an unreadable paper is denied the most productive discovery route and its deposition negative is weaker than an elink zero would be for a readable paper. Chen TQ et al. 2024
  3. E3established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.dataset

    GEO series GSE200059, the single hit returned by a keyword search on DOT1L and O-GlcNAc and titled 'Dot1L recruits OGT target chromatin to regulate histones O-GlcNAcylation', belongs to a different publication: its Series_pubmed_id is 35690146, its seventeen contributors do not overlap with the paper's authorship, it was submitted in April 2022, and its ten samples are HEK293T CUT&Tag for OGT and Dot1L rather than leukaemia cells.

    What this evidence cannot show

    Read on 2026-09-19 from the GEO accession-display text endpoint at both targ=gsm and targ=self. The exclusion rests on the series-level Series_pubmed_id field being present and pointing elsewhere; had that field been absent, contributor and date evidence alone would have made this probable rather than certain. Submitter-entered fields throughout.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • A series can legitimately be reused across publications from the same group, so a non-matching Series_pubmed_id is not always disqualifying - here the contributor list, the submission date and the HEK293T cell type all point the same way, which is what makes the exclusion safe. Rogic S et al. 2026
Connected to